PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOP vs. SPXM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOP vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF (GOP) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GOP

1D
0.09%
1M
-2.43%
6M
13.23%
YTD
18.70%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.06%

SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
8.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOP vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOP and SPXM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOP vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOP
GOP Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOP Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXM
SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOP vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF (GOP) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOPSPXMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

1.97

+2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.90

9.18

+4.72

GOP vs. SPXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the SPXM Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOP and SPXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOP vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOP drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOP and SPXM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOPSPXMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.42%

-5.08%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.88%

-5.08%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.78%

-0.75%

-3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-0.78%

-1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

Volatility

GOP vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison

Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF (GOP) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that GOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOPSPXMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

0.00%

+4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.62%

3.41%

+9.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

7.65%

+7.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.29%

7.56%

+6.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.29%

7.56%

+6.73%

GOP vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOP has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOP vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison

GOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOP
Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF
0.58%0.69%0.57%1.01%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOP and SPXM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOP has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOP dropped -15.42% vs SPXM's -5.08%.

On 1-year performance, GOP leads with 27.58% vs 8.13% for SPXM. On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOP has performed better with a 27.58% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for GOP.

GOP has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

They also come from different issuers: Tidal Investments and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for GOP and 0.47% for SPXM.

GOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOP and SPXM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer