GOP vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

GOP (Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GOP returned 20.59%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for BDGS. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GOP charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

GOP vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF (GOP) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOP achieves a 19.65% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 4.51% return.

GOP

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: 19.65%
• 6M: 18.65%
• 1Y: 31.34%
• 3Y*: 20.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -1.88%
• YTD: 4.51%
• 6M: 4.34%
• 1Y: 10.91%
• 3Y*: 13.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOP vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GOP Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF	19.65%	17.12%	14.43%	16.83%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	4.51%	10.61%	19.07%	8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between GOP and BDGS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	0.61

The correlation between GOP and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GOP vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOP

GOP Risk / Return Rank: 79
GOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
GOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
GOP Omega Ratio Rank: 70
GOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GOP Martin Ratio Rank: 88

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 66
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOP vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF (GOP) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GOP	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	1.72	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.56	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.34	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.49	2.72	+1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.13	11.31	+4.83

GOP vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOP and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GOP vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOP drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOP and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOP	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.42%	-9.12%	-6.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.88%	-4.03%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.42%	-9.12%	-6.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.00%	-1.88%	-1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-0.67%	-1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	0.97%	+0.94%

Volatility

GOP vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF (GOP) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 2.42%. This indicates that GOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOP	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.06%	2.42%	+3.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.53%	5.25%	+7.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.24%	6.39%	+8.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.29%	8.22%	+6.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.29%	8.22%	+6.07%

GOP vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOP has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

GOP vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

GOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than BDGS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
GOP Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF	0.57%	0.69%	0.57%	1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOP and BDGS in my portfolio?

GOP and BDGS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GOP or BDGS?

GOP has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to BDGS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOP dropped -15.42% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, GOP or BDGS?

On 3-year performance, GOP leads with 20.59% vs 13.50% for BDGS. On fees, GOP is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GOP or BDGS?

Over the 3-year period, GOP has performed better with a 20.59% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GOP or BDGS?

GOP is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GOP or BDGS?

GOP has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.53% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between GOP and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Tidal Investments and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for GOP and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.