GOOX vs. NVDQ
GOOX (T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF) and NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while NVDQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GOOX returned 200.27% vs -50.45% for NVDQ. Their -0.37 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.
Performance
GOOX vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOX achieves a 26.02% return, which is significantly higher than NVDQ's -39.70% return.
GOOX
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 7.84%
- 6M
- 7.89%
- YTD
- 26.02%
- 1Y
- 200.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 72.21%
NVDQ
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- -19.48%
- 6M
- -42.67%
- YTD
- -39.70%
- 1Y
- -50.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -83.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.51M | $7.09M | $7.60M | |
| $24.84M | $29.28M | $55.12M |
GOOX vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | 26.02% | 121.41% | 44.31% |
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | -39.70% | -74.63% | -92.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOX and NVDQ is -0.31, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOX vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank
GOOX
NVDQ
GOOX vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOOX | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.91 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | -0.83 | +6.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.28 | -1.44 | +14.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOOX vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOX drawdown since its inception was -52.46%, smaller than the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOX and NVDQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOX | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.46% | -99.45% | +46.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.00% | -61.17% | +22.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.24% | -99.39% | +83.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.47% | -88.75% | +71.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.14% | 35.09% | -19.95% |
Volatility
GOOX vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) has a higher volatility of 27.30% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) at 24.71%. This indicates that GOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOX | NVDQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.30% | 24.71% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.45% | 57.15% | -7.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.04% | 72.63% | -8.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.93% | 94.71% | -32.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.93% | 94.71% | -32.78% |
GOOX vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GOOX and NVDQ have an expense ratio of 1.05%.
Dividends
GOOX vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison
GOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than NVDQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | 0.24% | 0.30% | 16.78% | 0.00% |
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 0.43% | 0.26% | 4.59% | 11.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOX and NVDQ have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOX has higher volatility (27.30%) compared to NVDQ (24.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOX dropped -52.46% vs NVDQ's -99.45%.
On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 200.27% vs -50.45% for NVDQ. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDQ has been the lower-risk option at 24.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 200.27% return vs -50.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOOX and NVDQ have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.
NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.24% for GOOX.
GOOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDQ is Inverse Equities.
GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOX and NVDQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer