PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOX vs. NVDQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOX vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOX achieves a 26.02% return, which is significantly higher than NVDQ's -39.70% return.


GOOX

1D
1.59%
1M
7.84%
6M
7.89%
YTD
26.02%
1Y
200.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
72.21%

NVDQ

1D
-5.06%
1M
-19.48%
6M
-42.67%
YTD
-39.70%
1Y
-50.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-83.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.51M$7.09M$7.60M
$24.84M$29.28M$55.12M

GOOX vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GOOX
T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF
26.02%121.41%44.31%
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
-39.70%-74.63%-92.40%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOX and NVDQ is -0.31, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

-0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOX vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOOX
GOOX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDQ
NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOOX vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOXNVDQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.91

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.17

-0.83

+6.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.28

-1.44

+14.72

GOOX vs. NVDQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the NVDQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOX and NVDQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOX vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOX drawdown since its inception was -52.46%, smaller than the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOX and NVDQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOXNVDQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.46%

-99.45%

+46.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.00%

-61.17%

+22.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.24%

-99.39%

+83.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-88.75%

+71.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.14%

35.09%

-19.95%

Volatility

GOOX vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) has a higher volatility of 27.30% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) at 24.71%. This indicates that GOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOXNVDQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.30%

24.71%

+2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.45%

57.15%

-7.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.04%

72.63%

-8.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.93%

94.71%

-32.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.93%

94.71%

-32.78%

GOOX vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GOOX and NVDQ have an expense ratio of 1.05%.


Dividends

GOOX vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison

GOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than NVDQ's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOX
T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF
0.24%0.30%16.78%0.00%
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
0.43%0.26%4.59%11.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOX and NVDQ have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOX has higher volatility (27.30%) compared to NVDQ (24.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOX dropped -52.46% vs NVDQ's -99.45%.

On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 200.27% vs -50.45% for NVDQ. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDQ has been the lower-risk option at 24.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 200.27% return vs -50.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOOX and NVDQ have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.

NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.24% for GOOX.

GOOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDQ is Inverse Equities.

GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOX and NVDQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer