PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOW vs. PAPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOW vs. PAPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOW achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than PAPI's 6.49% return.


GOOW

1D
4.51%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
20.63%
6M
17.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PAPI

1D
0.64%
1M
0.17%
YTD
6.49%
6M
6.38%
1Y
13.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOW vs. PAPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOOW and PAPI is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.06

GOOW vs. PAPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GOOW
PAPI

Communication Services

100.0%
5.4%

Basic Materials

-

7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.1%

Energy

-

11.6%

Financial Services

-

9.9%

Healthcare

-

10.7%

Industrials

-

9.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

12.5%

Utilities

-

10.1%

Communication Services

GOOW
100.0%
PAPI
5.4%

Basic Materials

GOOW

-

PAPI
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GOOW

-

PAPI
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

GOOW

-

PAPI
10.1%

Energy

GOOW

-

PAPI
11.6%

Financial Services

GOOW

-

PAPI
9.9%

Healthcare

GOOW

-

PAPI
10.7%

Industrials

GOOW

-

PAPI
9.9%

Real Estate

GOOW

-

PAPI

-

Technology

GOOW

-

PAPI
12.5%

Utilities

GOOW

-

PAPI
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOW vs. PAPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOW

PAPI
PAPI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOW vs. PAPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GOOW vs. PAPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOOWPAPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.71

0.90

+2.81

Drawdowns

GOOW vs. PAPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOW drawdown since its inception was -24.88%, which is greater than PAPI's maximum drawdown of -14.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOW and PAPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOWPAPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.88%

-14.27%

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.28%

-4.45%

-4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-2.73%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

Volatility

GOOW vs. PAPI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOWPAPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.56%

10.47%

+27.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.56%

11.76%

+25.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.56%

11.76%

+25.80%

GOOW vs. PAPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PAPI's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOOW vs. PAPI - Dividend Comparison

GOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.69%, more than PAPI's 7.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOW
Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF
33.69%19.77%0.00%0.00%
PAPI
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
7.57%7.59%7.07%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOW and PAPI have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAPI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAPI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOW.

GOOW has the higher dividend yield at 33.69%, compared with 7.57% for PAPI.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOW and 0.29% for PAPI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOW and PAPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer