GOOW vs. MAGS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GOOW (Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOOW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GOOW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.

Performance

GOOW vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOW achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's 4.79% return.

GOOW

• 1D: 4.51%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: 20.63%
• 6M: 17.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAGS

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: 4.79%
• 6M: 4.17%
• 1Y: 32.45%
• 3Y*: 34.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOW vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	20.63%	75.51%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	4.79%	16.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOW and MAGS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.62

GOOW vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GOOW	MAGS
Communication Services	100.0%	9.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	15.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GOOW vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 42
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOW vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GOOW	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.71	1.56	+2.15

Drawdowns

GOOW vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOW drawdown since its inception was -24.88%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOW and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOOW	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.88%	-29.91%	+5.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.62%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.28%	-2.57%	-6.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-4.70%	-0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GOOW	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.89%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.34%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.56%	20.10%	+17.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.56%	25.93%	+11.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.56%	25.93%	+11.63%

GOOW vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

GOOW vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

GOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.69%, more than MAGS's 1.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	33.69%	19.77%	0.00%	0.00%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.41%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOOW and MAGS in my portfolio?

GOOW and MAGS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GOOW or MAGS?

On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GOOW or MAGS?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GOOW or MAGS?

GOOW has the higher dividend yield at 33.69%, compared with 1.41% for MAGS.

What is the main difference between GOOW and MAGS?

GOOW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGS is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOW and 0.29% for MAGS.