PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXW vs. MAGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXW vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly lower than MAGY's -1.50% return.


GDXW

1D
-4.02%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-4.89%
6M
2.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGY

1D
-1.26%
1M
1.86%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
13.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXW vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GDXW and MAGY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXW vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXW

MAGY
MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXW vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GDXW vs. MAGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXWMAGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.53

-1.08

Drawdowns

GDXW vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than MAGY's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and MAGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXWMAGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.83%

-14.29%

-22.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.99%

-3.64%

-29.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.45%

-2.69%

-10.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

Volatility

GDXW vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXWMAGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.39%

14.38%

+47.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.39%

14.57%

+46.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.39%

14.57%

+46.82%

GDXW vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GDXW and MAGY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

GDXW vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison

GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.39%, more than MAGY's 37.35% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GDXW and MAGY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDXW and MAGY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 39.39%, compared with 37.35% for MAGY.

GDXW is categorized as Gold, while MAGY is Derivative Income.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXW and MAGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer