PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOW vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOW vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOW achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 70.00% return.


GOOW

1D
4.51%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
20.63%
6M
17.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHAT

1D
-2.47%
1M
21.73%
YTD
70.00%
6M
67.89%
1Y
133.72%
3Y*
54.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOW vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOOW and CHAT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.46

GOOW vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GOOW
CHAT

Communication Services

100.0%
16.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

76.5%

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

GOOW
100.0%
CHAT
16.6%

Basic Materials

GOOW

-

CHAT

-

Consumer Cyclical

GOOW

-

CHAT
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

GOOW

-

CHAT

-

Energy

GOOW

-

CHAT

-

Financial Services

GOOW

-

CHAT
0.0%

Healthcare

GOOW

-

CHAT

-

Industrials

GOOW

-

CHAT
0.8%

Real Estate

GOOW

-

CHAT

-

Technology

GOOW

-

CHAT
76.5%

Utilities

GOOW

-

CHAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOW vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOW

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOW vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GOOW vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOOWCHATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.71

1.93

+1.78

Drawdowns

GOOW vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOW drawdown since its inception was -24.88%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOW and CHAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOWCHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.88%

-31.34%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.28%

-3.11%

-6.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-5.35%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

Volatility

GOOW vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOWCHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.56%

30.81%

+6.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.56%

29.92%

+7.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.56%

29.92%

+7.64%

GOOW vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOOW vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

GOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.69%, more than CHAT's 1.68% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GOOW and CHAT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOW.

GOOW has the higher dividend yield at 33.69%, compared with 1.68% for CHAT.

GOOW is categorized as Derivative Income, while CHAT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOW and 0.75% for CHAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOW and CHAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer