PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOP vs. PBP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOP vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOP achieves a 17.17% return, which is significantly higher than PBP's 5.03% return.


GOOP

1D
4.28%
1M
-4.63%
YTD
17.17%
6M
16.35%
1Y
100.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBP

1D
0.13%
1M
1.84%
YTD
5.03%
6M
6.58%
1Y
17.99%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
7.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOP vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
17.17%52.46%27.67%6.17%
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
5.03%8.49%19.83%3.16%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOP and PBP is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOP vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PBP
PBP Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOP vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOOPPBPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.59

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

3.46

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.36

18.33

-1.97

GOOP vs. PBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOP Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is higher than the PBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOP and PBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOOPPBPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53

2.63

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

0.35

+1.24

Drawdowns

GOOP vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOP drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOP and PBP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOPPBPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.49%

-43.43%

+15.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.32%

-5.22%

-18.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.13%

-0.04%

-8.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-6.69%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.14%

0.98%

+5.16%

Volatility

GOOP vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) has a higher volatility of 10.02% compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) at 0.90%. This indicates that GOOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOPPBPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.02%

0.90%

+9.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.96%

5.53%

+17.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.55%

6.87%

+21.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.02%

11.86%

+14.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.02%

13.66%

+12.36%

GOOP vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOOP vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

GOOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.75%, more than PBP's 11.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
11.75%11.79%13.73%2.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
11.14%11.12%9.36%3.35%1.33%6.21%1.41%5.04%2.59%10.86%2.56%6.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOP and PBP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOP has higher volatility (10.02%) compared to PBP (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOP dropped -27.49% vs PBP's -43.43%.

On 1-year performance, GOOP leads with 100.07% vs 17.99% for PBP. On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOP has performed better with a 100.07% return vs 17.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOP.

GOOP has the higher dividend yield at 11.75%, compared with 11.14% for PBP.

They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOP and 0.29% for PBP.

GOOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOP and PBP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer