GOOGL vs. TMF
GOOGL (Alphabet Inc. Class A) is a stock, while TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) is Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Over the past 10 years, GOOGL returned 25.05%/yr vs -17.99%/yr for TMF. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GOOGL vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOGL achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than TMF's -11.04% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOGL has outperformed TMF with an annualized return of 25.05%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively lower -17.99% annualized return.
GOOGL
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- 6M
- 6.80%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- 90.75%
- 3Y*
- 43.56%
- 5Y*
- 22.73%
- 10Y*
- 25.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 25.38%
TMF
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -9.25%
- 6M
- -12.35%
- YTD
- -11.04%
- 1Y
- -4.28%
- 3Y*
- -21.59%
- 5Y*
- -33.52%
- 10Y*
- -17.99%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.34%
GOOGL vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A | 12.60% | 65.99% | 36.01% | 58.32% | -39.09% | 65.30% | 30.85% | 28.18% | -0.80% | 32.93% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -11.04% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOGL and TMF is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2009 | -0.15 |
The correlation between GOOGL and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOGL vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
GOOGL
TMF
GOOGL vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOOGL | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.00 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.48 | -0.16 | +4.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.64 | -0.32 | +13.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOOGL vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOGL drawdown since its inception was -65.29%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOGL and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOGL | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.29% | -92.89% | +27.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.37% | -26.51% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.81% | -53.47% | +23.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.32% | -88.81% | +44.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.32% | -92.89% | +48.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.52% | -92.64% | +80.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -43.97% | +30.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.67% | 13.22% | -6.55% |
Volatility
GOOGL vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) has a higher volatility of 10.52% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 7.53%. This indicates that GOOGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOGL | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.52% | 7.53% | +2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.72% | 19.87% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.55% | 27.62% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.67% | 46.39% | -14.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.28% | 43.72% | -14.44% |
Dividends
GOOGL vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than TMF's 4.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.44% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOGL and TMF have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOGL has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to TMF (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOGL dropped -65.29% vs TMF's -92.89%.
GOOGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOGL and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer