PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOG vs. XEMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOG vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alphabet Inc (GOOG) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOG achieves a 13.80% return, which is significantly higher than XEMD's 2.49% return.


GOOG

1D
6.88%
1M
-0.35%
6M
5.49%
YTD
13.80%
1Y
85.45%
3Y*
39.73%
5Y*
21.62%
10Y*
25.03%
ALL TIME*
22.84%

XEMD

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.62%
6M
1.43%
YTD
2.49%
1Y
8.88%
3Y*
10.14%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.78B$6.87B$7.98B
$5.44M$11.46M$8.01M

GOOG vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
13.80%65.42%35.62%58.83%-20.96%
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
2.49%13.98%8.77%10.26%2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOG and XEMD is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOG vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOOG
GOOG Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

XEMD
XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOOG vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc (GOOG) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOGXEMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.36

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

2.53

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.53

10.95

+0.58

GOOG vs. XEMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the XEMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOG and XEMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOG vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOG drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, which is greater than XEMD's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOG and XEMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOGXEMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.60%

-10.01%

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.75%

-3.52%

-17.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.35%

-4.23%

-25.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.57%

-0.96%

-9.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-1.23%

-7.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.44%

0.81%

+6.63%

Volatility

GOOG vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison

Alphabet Inc (GOOG) has a higher volatility of 13.08% compared to BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) at 0.96%. This indicates that GOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOGXEMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.08%

0.96%

+12.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.59%

3.80%

+20.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.77%

4.74%

+27.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.80%

6.80%

+25.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.34%

6.80%

+22.54%

Dividends

GOOG vs. XEMD - Dividend Comparison

GOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than XEMD's 5.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
0.24%0.26%0.32%0.00%0.00%
XEMD
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF
5.82%6.15%6.30%6.19%3.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOG and XEMD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOG has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to XEMD (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOG dropped -44.60% vs XEMD's -10.01%.

GOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOG and XEMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer