PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOG vs. MS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOOG vs. MS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alphabet Inc (GOOG) and Morgan Stanley (MS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOG achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly lower than MS's 20.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GOOG having a 26.05% annualized return and MS not far ahead at 27.13%.


GOOG

1D
-1.20%
1M
-8.98%
YTD
15.25%
6M
15.01%
1Y
107.32%
3Y*
43.67%
5Y*
23.94%
10Y*
26.05%

MS

1D
0.15%
1M
9.92%
YTD
20.86%
6M
21.34%
1Y
64.89%
3Y*
39.40%
5Y*
21.89%
10Y*
27.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOG vs. MS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
15.25%65.42%35.62%58.83%-38.67%65.17%31.03%29.10%-1.03%35.58%
MS
Morgan Stanley
20.86%45.16%39.73%13.93%-10.34%46.65%38.09%32.67%-22.76%26.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOG and MS is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2014

0.41

The correlation between GOOG and MS shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GOOG:

$4.42T

MS:

$338.10B

EPS

GOOG:

$13.11

MS:

$11.41

PE Ratio

GOOG:

27.54

MS:

18.59

PEG Ratio

GOOG:

1.35

MS:

1.75

PS Ratio

GOOG:

10.44

MS:

2.81

PB Ratio

GOOG:

9.23

MS:

3.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOOG:

$422.57B

MS:

$120.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOOG:

$255.12B

MS:

$69.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

GOOG:

$174.08B

MS:

$27.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOG vs. MS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOG
GOOG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MS
MS Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOG vs. MS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc (GOOG) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOOGMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.43

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.20

3.46

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.68

11.46

+7.22

GOOG vs. MS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOG Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is higher than the MS Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOG and MS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOOGMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.76

2.55

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.77

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.86

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.29

+0.53

Drawdowns

GOOG vs. MS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOG drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, smaller than the maximum MS drawdown of -88.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOG and MS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOGMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.60%

-88.12%

+43.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.75%

-18.83%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.35%

-29.24%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.60%

-32.38%

-12.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.60%

-51.33%

+6.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.44%

-2.76%

-6.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-33.70%

+24.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

5.68%

+0.09%

Volatility

GOOG vs. MS - Volatility Comparison

Alphabet Inc (GOOG) and Morgan Stanley (MS) have volatilities of 8.43% and 8.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOGMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

8.06%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.50%

21.21%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.74%

25.62%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.14%

28.72%

+2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.02%

31.51%

-2.49%

Dividends

GOOG vs. MS - Dividend Comparison

GOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than MS's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
0.29%0.26%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MS
Morgan Stanley
1.88%2.17%2.82%3.49%3.47%2.14%2.04%2.54%2.77%1.72%1.66%1.73%

Financials

GOOG vs. MS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alphabet Inc and Morgan Stanley. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
109.90B
33.15B
(GOOG) Total Revenue
(MS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GOOG vs. MS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alphabet Inc and Morgan Stanley over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
62.5%
61.8%
Portfolio components
GOOG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

MS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a gross profit of 20.48B and revenue of 33.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.

GOOG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

MS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported an operating income of 7.01B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.

GOOG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.

MS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Morgan Stanley reported a net income of 5.64B and revenue of 33.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GOOG and MS have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOG has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to MS (8.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOG dropped -44.60% vs MS's -88.12%.

GOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOG and MS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer