GOOD vs. FEPI
GOOD (Gladstone Commercial Corporation) is a stock, while FEPI (REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by REX. Over the past year, GOOD returned -3.49% vs 32.79% for FEPI. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GOOD vs. FEPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOD achieves a 23.25% return, which is significantly higher than FEPI's 10.45% return.
GOOD
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- -3.49%
- 3Y*
- 11.47%
- 5Y*
- -2.59%
- 10Y*
- 5.52%
FEPI
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 5.76%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 32.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOD vs. FEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 23.25% | -28.11% | 33.25% | 11.32% |
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.45% | 18.33% | 15.69% | 11.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOD and FEPI is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOD vs. FEPI — Risk / Return Rank
GOOD
FEPI
GOOD vs. FEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOOD | FEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.36 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 2.55 | -2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 8.56 | -8.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOOD | FEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 1.99 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 1.16 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
GOOD vs. FEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOD drawdown since its inception was -67.22%, which is greater than FEPI's maximum drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOD and FEPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOD | FEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.22% | -23.56% | -43.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.87% | -12.91% | -12.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.31% | -1.43% | -26.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.43% | -3.50% | -9.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | 3.84% | +10.86% |
Volatility
GOOD vs. FEPI - Volatility Comparison
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) at 3.31%. This indicates that GOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOD | FEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | 3.31% | +4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.66% | 12.54% | +3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.74% | 16.52% | +5.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 19.00% | +6.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.14% | 19.00% | +13.14% |
Dividends
GOOD vs. FEPI - Dividend Comparison
GOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.52%, less than FEPI's 23.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF | 23.91% | 25.48% | 27.18% | 4.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 9.52% | 11.25% | 7.39% | 9.06% | 8.13% | 5.83% | 8.34% | 6.86% | 8.37% | 7.12% | 7.46% | 10.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOD and FEPI have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOD has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to FEPI (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOD dropped -67.22% vs FEPI's -23.56%.
FEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOD and FEPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer