GOOD vs. GLAD
GOOD (Gladstone Commercial Corporation) and GLAD (Gladstone Capital Corporation) are both stocks. GOOD operates in REIT - Diversified (Real Estate), while GLAD operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, GOOD returned 4.73%/yr vs 11.26%/yr for GLAD. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GOOD vs. GLAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOD achieves a 24.17% return, which is significantly higher than GLAD's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOD has underperformed GLAD with an annualized return of 4.73%, while GLAD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.26% annualized return.
GOOD
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- YTD
- 24.17%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- -3.76%
- 10Y*
- 4.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.54%
GLAD
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- 6M
- -4.87%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 1Y
- -24.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.38M | $3.15M | $3.26M | |
| $5.11M | $5.40M | $6.46M |
GOOD vs. GLAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 24.17% | -28.11% | 33.25% | -21.63% | -22.52% | 53.53% | -9.58% | 30.74% | -7.82% | 12.41% |
GLAD Gladstone Capital Corporation | -4.42% | -21.14% | 46.99% | 22.71% | -10.43% | 40.50% | -0.69% | 48.58% | -13.07% | 7.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOD and GLAD is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2003 | 0.32 |
The correlation between GOOD and GLAD shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GOOD:
$605.09M
GLAD:
$421.81M
GOOD:
$0.67
GLAD:
$1.04
GOOD:
18.62
GLAD:
17.96
GOOD:
0.20
GLAD:
1.04
GOOD:
2.37
GLAD:
7.52
GOOD:
$165.74M
GLAD:
$66.59M
GOOD:
-$19.45M
GLAD:
$28.95M
GOOD:
$45.52M
GLAD:
$27.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOD vs. GLAD — Risk / Return Rank
GOOD
GLAD
GOOD vs. GLAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOOD | GLAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.84 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | -0.72 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.53 | -1.09 | +1.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOOD vs. GLAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOD drawdown since its inception was -67.22%, smaller than the maximum GLAD drawdown of -74.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOD and GLAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOD | GLAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.22% | -74.87% | +7.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.09% | -35.67% | +15.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.29% | -39.59% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.30% | -39.59% | -13.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.25% | -58.37% | -7.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.77% | -29.62% | +1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -18.76% | +5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.62% | 23.90% | -14.28% |
Volatility
GOOD vs. GLAD - Volatility Comparison
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD) at 5.40%. This indicates that GOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOD | GLAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.27% | 5.40% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.85% | 19.11% | -2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.25% | 26.16% | -3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.14% | 23.69% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.24% | 30.05% | +2.19% |
Dividends
GOOD vs. GLAD - Dividend Comparison
GOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, less than GLAD's 10.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLAD Gladstone Capital Corporation | 10.34% | 9.85% | 8.37% | 9.16% | 8.42% | 6.73% | 8.97% | 8.46% | 11.51% | 9.12% | 8.95% | 11.49% |
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 9.60% | 11.25% | 7.39% | 9.06% | 8.13% | 5.83% | 8.34% | 6.86% | 8.37% | 7.12% | 7.46% | 10.28% |
Financials
GOOD vs. GLAD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Commercial Corporation and Gladstone Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GOOD vs. GLAD - Profitability Comparison
GOOD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 41.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GLAD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 21.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GOOD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 41.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
GLAD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 21.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
GOOD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a net income of 6.97M and revenue of 41.91M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.
GLAD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Capital Corporation reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 21.49M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOD and GLAD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOD has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to GLAD (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOD dropped -67.22% vs GLAD's -74.87%.
GOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOD and GLAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer