GOOD vs. LAND
GOOD (Gladstone Commercial Corporation) and LAND (Gladstone Land Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — GOOD in REIT - Diversified, LAND in REIT - Industrial. Over the past 10 years, GOOD returned 4.75%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for LAND. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GOOD vs. LAND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOD achieves a 16.80% return, which is significantly higher than LAND's -3.94% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOD has outperformed LAND with an annualized return of 4.75%, while LAND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.76% annualized return.
GOOD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- 16.80%
- 6M
- 17.13%
- 1Y
- -8.91%
- 3Y*
- 9.42%
- 5Y*
- -4.42%
- 10Y*
- 4.75%
LAND
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -10.80%
- YTD
- -3.94%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- -11.01%
- 3Y*
- -14.69%
- 5Y*
- -16.21%
- 10Y*
- 1.76%
GOOD vs. LAND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 16.80% | -28.11% | 33.25% | -21.63% | -22.52% | 53.53% | -9.58% | 30.74% | -7.82% | 12.41% |
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | -3.94% | -10.69% | -21.63% | -18.49% | -44.42% | 136.25% | 17.35% | 18.07% | -10.82% | 24.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOD and LAND is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2013 | 0.43 |
The correlation between GOOD and LAND shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GOOD:
$0.60
LAND:
-$0.31
GOOD:
2.54
LAND:
3.72
GOOD:
$165.74M
LAND:
$86.33M
GOOD:
-$19.45M
LAND:
$12.83M
GOOD:
$45.52M
LAND:
$64.70M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOD vs. LAND — Risk / Return Rank
GOOD
LAND
GOOD vs. LAND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOOD | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.96 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | -0.36 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | -0.74 | +0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOOD vs. LAND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOD drawdown since its inception was -67.22%, smaller than the maximum LAND drawdown of -76.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOD and LAND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOD | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.22% | -76.45% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.38% | -30.47% | +5.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.29% | -45.24% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.30% | -76.45% | +23.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.25% | -76.45% | +10.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.06% | -75.45% | +43.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.46% | -30.78% | +17.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.29% | 15.01% | -0.72% |
Volatility
GOOD vs. LAND - Volatility Comparison
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) have volatilities of 6.14% and 6.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOD | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | 6.18% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.26% | 22.22% | -5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.11% | 29.52% | -7.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 31.39% | -6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.19% | 29.96% | +2.23% |
Dividends
GOOD vs. LAND - Dividend Comparison
GOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.21%, more than LAND's 5.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 9.21% | 11.25% | 7.39% | 9.06% | 8.13% | 5.83% | 8.34% | 6.86% | 8.37% | 7.12% | 7.46% | 10.28% |
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 5.98% | 6.12% | 5.16% | 3.83% | 2.98% | 1.60% | 3.67% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.90% | 4.40% | 5.38% |
Financials
GOOD vs. LAND - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Commercial Corporation and Gladstone Land Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GOOD vs. LAND - Profitability Comparison
GOOD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 41.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LAND - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 14.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.9%.
GOOD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 41.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
LAND - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported an operating income of 12.68M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 85.7%.
GOOD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a net income of 6.97M and revenue of 41.91M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.
LAND - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a net income of -9.99M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in a net margin of -67.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOD and LAND have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAND has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to GOOD (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOD dropped -67.22% vs LAND's -76.45%.
LAND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOD and LAND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer