PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GOOD vs. LAND
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GOODLAND
YTD Return4.12%-10.99%
1Y Return24.53%-17.48%
3Y Return (Ann)-6.95%-13.05%
5Y Return (Ann)-1.43%3.75%
10Y Return (Ann)5.53%4.10%
Sharpe Ratio0.85-0.70
Daily Std Dev26.61%26.15%
Max Drawdown-67.22%-68.33%
Current Drawdown-37.05%-67.50%

Fundamentals


GOODLAND
Market Cap$548.02M$457.03M
EPS-$0.19-$0.28
PEG Ratio-62.6722.95
Revenue (TTM)$147.58M$90.34M
Gross Profit (TTM)$115.82M$78.04M
EBITDA (TTM)$101.30M$71.12M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between GOOD and LAND is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GOOD vs. LAND - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GOOD achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly higher than LAND's -10.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOD has outperformed LAND with an annualized return of 5.53%, while LAND has yielded a comparatively lower 4.10% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
77.87%
36.38%
GOOD
LAND

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Gladstone Commercial Corporation

Gladstone Land Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GOOD vs. LAND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOOD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GOOD, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GOOD, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.35
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GOOD, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GOOD, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.42
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GOOD, currently valued at 3.52, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.52
LAND
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LAND, currently valued at -0.70, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.70
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LAND, currently valued at -0.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.87
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LAND, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.90
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LAND, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.27
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LAND, currently valued at -1.16, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.16

GOOD vs. LAND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOD Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the LAND Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GOOD and LAND.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.85
-0.70
GOOD
LAND

Dividends

GOOD vs. LAND - Dividend Comparison

GOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.65%, more than LAND's 4.38% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GOOD
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
8.65%8.57%8.13%5.83%8.34%6.86%8.37%7.12%7.46%10.28%8.74%8.35%
LAND
Gladstone Land Corporation
4.38%3.83%2.98%1.60%3.67%4.12%4.63%3.90%4.40%5.38%3.36%9.07%

Drawdowns

GOOD vs. LAND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOD drawdown since its inception was -67.22%, roughly equal to the maximum LAND drawdown of -68.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOD and LAND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-37.05%
-67.50%
GOOD
LAND

Volatility

GOOD vs. LAND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is 6.13%, while Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that GOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
6.13%
7.23%
GOOD
LAND

Financials

GOOD vs. LAND - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Commercial Corporation and Gladstone Land Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items