GOOD vs. LAND
Compare and contrast key facts about Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND).
Performance
GOOD vs. LAND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GOOD vs. LAND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 11.18% | -28.11% | 33.25% | -21.63% | -22.52% | 53.53% | -9.58% | 30.74% | -7.82% | 12.41% |
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 13.63% | -10.69% | -21.63% | -18.49% | -44.42% | 136.25% | 17.35% | 18.07% | -10.82% | 24.66% |
Fundamentals
GOOD:
$545.82M
LAND:
$374.56M
GOOD:
$0.41
LAND:
-$0.29
GOOD:
3.36
LAND:
4.89
GOOD:
$161.34M
LAND:
$76.13M
GOOD:
$0.00
LAND:
$66.54M
GOOD:
$58.25M
LAND:
$94.39M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOD achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly lower than LAND's 13.63% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOD has outperformed LAND with an annualized return of 4.79%, while LAND has yielded a comparatively lower 4.39% annualized return.
GOOD
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- -15.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.21%
- 5Y*
- -2.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
LAND
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -15.25%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 13.17%
- 1Y
- 4.73%
- 3Y*
- -10.82%
- 5Y*
- -7.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOD vs. LAND — Risk / Return Rank
GOOD
LAND
GOOD vs. LAND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOOD | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | 0.15 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | 0.43 | -1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.06 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 0.16 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 0.30 | -1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOOD | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | 0.15 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | -0.25 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.05 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOD and LAND is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GOOD vs. LAND - Dividend Comparison
GOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.38%, more than LAND's 5.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 10.38% | 11.25% | 7.39% | 9.06% | 8.13% | 5.83% | 8.34% | 6.86% | 8.37% | 7.12% | 7.46% | 10.28% |
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 5.46% | 6.12% | 5.16% | 3.83% | 2.98% | 1.60% | 3.67% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.90% | 4.40% | 5.38% |
Drawdowns
GOOD vs. LAND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOD drawdown since its inception was -67.22%, smaller than the maximum LAND drawdown of -76.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOD and LAND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOD | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.22% | -76.45% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.07% | -20.69% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.30% | -76.45% | +23.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.25% | -76.45% | +10.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.32% | -70.95% | +35.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -30.09% | +16.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.74% | 11.26% | +3.48% |
Volatility
GOOD vs. LAND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is 6.85%, while Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that GOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GOOD | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 9.71% | -2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 21.94% | -5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 31.48% | -9.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 31.69% | -6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.11% | 29.95% | +2.16% |
Financials
GOOD vs. LAND - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Commercial Corporation and Gladstone Land Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities