GOOD vs. MMM
Compare and contrast key facts about Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and 3M Company (MMM).
Performance
GOOD vs. MMM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GOOD vs. MMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 11.18% | -28.11% | 33.25% | -21.63% | -22.52% | 53.53% | -9.58% | 30.74% | -7.82% | 12.41% |
MMM 3M Company | -8.87% | 26.36% | 46.13% | -3.33% | -29.63% | 4.85% | 2.77% | -4.29% | -16.90% | 34.90% |
Fundamentals
GOOD:
$545.82M
MMM:
$78.29B
GOOD:
$0.41
MMM:
$6.00
GOOD:
28.09
MMM:
24.21
GOOD:
3.36
MMM:
3.15
GOOD:
$161.34M
MMM:
$24.95B
GOOD:
$0.00
MMM:
$9.87B
GOOD:
$58.25M
MMM:
$5.85B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOD achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly higher than MMM's -8.87% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOD has outperformed MMM with an annualized return of 4.79%, while MMM has yielded a comparatively lower 3.70% annualized return.
GOOD
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- -15.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.21%
- 5Y*
- -2.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
MMM
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -10.04%
- YTD
- -8.87%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- 0.17%
- 3Y*
- 22.36%
- 5Y*
- 1.55%
- 10Y*
- 3.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOD vs. MMM — Risk / Return Rank
GOOD
MMM
GOOD vs. MMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOOD | MMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | 0.01 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | 0.23 | -1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.03 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 0.04 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 0.11 | -1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOOD | MMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | 0.01 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | 0.06 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.14 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.34 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOD and MMM is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GOOD vs. MMM - Dividend Comparison
GOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.38%, more than MMM's 2.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 10.38% | 11.25% | 7.39% | 9.06% | 8.13% | 5.83% | 8.34% | 6.86% | 8.37% | 7.12% | 7.46% | 10.28% |
MMM 3M Company | 2.04% | 1.82% | 16.27% | 5.49% | 4.97% | 3.33% | 3.36% | 3.26% | 2.86% | 2.00% | 2.49% | 2.72% |
Drawdowns
GOOD vs. MMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOD drawdown since its inception was -67.22%, which is greater than MMM's maximum drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOD and MMM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOD | MMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.22% | -59.10% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.07% | -18.77% | -7.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.30% | -54.07% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.25% | -59.10% | -7.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.32% | -16.44% | -18.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -16.11% | +2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.74% | 6.45% | +8.29% |
Volatility
GOOD vs. MMM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is 6.85%, while 3M Company (MMM) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that GOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GOOD | MMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 8.79% | -1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 20.09% | -3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 30.96% | -8.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 28.08% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.11% | 26.36% | +5.75% |
Financials
GOOD vs. MMM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Commercial Corporation and 3M Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities