GOOD vs. MMM
Compare and contrast key facts about Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and 3M Company (MMM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GOOD or MMM.
Correlation
The correlation between GOOD and MMM is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GOOD vs. MMM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GOOD:
1.50
MMM:
1.39
GOOD:
2.19
MMM:
2.59
GOOD:
1.27
MMM:
1.36
GOOD:
0.74
MMM:
0.85
GOOD:
9.83
MMM:
7.34
GOOD:
3.31%
MMM:
6.36%
GOOD:
21.65%
MMM:
33.64%
GOOD:
-67.22%
MMM:
-59.10%
GOOD:
-20.39%
MMM:
-24.61%
Fundamentals
GOOD:
$739.45M
MMM:
$69.73B
GOOD:
$0.21
MMM:
$9.61
GOOD:
79.38
MMM:
13.32
GOOD:
-62.67
MMM:
1.90
GOOD:
$147.92M
MMM:
$28.57B
GOOD:
$104.92M
MMM:
$12.31B
GOOD:
$105.87M
MMM:
$6.89B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOD achieves a 31.03% return, which is significantly lower than MMM's 42.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOD has outperformed MMM with an annualized return of 7.66%, while MMM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.43% annualized return.
GOOD
31.03%
-5.08%
17.86%
30.54%
1.83%
7.66%
MMM
42.09%
-3.56%
25.91%
46.20%
0.94%
2.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GOOD vs. MMM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GOOD vs. MMM - Dividend Comparison
GOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, more than MMM's 2.68% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 6.85% | 9.06% | 8.13% | 5.83% | 8.34% | 6.86% | 8.37% | 7.12% | 7.46% | 10.28% | 8.74% | 8.35% |
MMM 3M Company | 2.68% | 5.49% | 4.97% | 3.33% | 3.36% | 3.26% | 2.86% | 2.00% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 2.08% | 1.81% |
Drawdowns
GOOD vs. MMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOD drawdown since its inception was -67.22%, which is greater than MMM's maximum drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOD and MMM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GOOD vs. MMM - Volatility Comparison
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to 3M Company (MMM) at 5.14%. This indicates that GOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GOOD vs. MMM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Commercial Corporation and 3M Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities