GOOD vs. ARCC
GOOD (Gladstone Commercial Corporation) and ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) are both stocks. GOOD operates in REIT - Diversified (Real Estate), while ARCC operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, GOOD returned 4.73%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for ARCC. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GOOD vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOD achieves a 24.17% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -2.30% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOD has underperformed ARCC with an annualized return of 4.73%, while ARCC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.33% annualized return.
GOOD
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- YTD
- 24.17%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- -3.76%
- 10Y*
- 4.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.54%
ARCC
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- -2.30%
- 1Y
- -7.66%
- 3Y*
- 8.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $81.64M | $84.10M | $93.93M | |
| $5.11M | $5.40M | $6.46M |
GOOD vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 24.17% | -28.11% | 33.25% | -21.63% | -22.52% | 53.53% | -9.58% | 30.74% | -7.82% | 12.41% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -2.30% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 36.14% | 0.86% | 31.30% | 8.81% | 4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOD and ARCC is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
GOOD:
$605.09M
ARCC:
$13.47B
GOOD:
$0.67
ARCC:
$1.35
GOOD:
18.62
ARCC:
13.89
GOOD:
0.20
ARCC:
2.08
GOOD:
2.37
ARCC:
6.28
GOOD:
$165.74M
ARCC:
$2.13B
GOOD:
-$19.45M
ARCC:
$1.36B
GOOD:
$45.52M
ARCC:
$1.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOD vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
GOOD
ARCC
GOOD vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOOD | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.94 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | -0.50 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.53 | -0.91 | +1.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOOD vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOD drawdown since its inception was -67.22%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOD and ARCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOD | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.22% | -79.36% | +12.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.09% | -17.35% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.29% | -19.35% | -15.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.30% | -21.76% | -31.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.25% | -56.77% | -9.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.77% | -11.07% | -16.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -9.12% | -4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.62% | 9.51% | +0.11% |
Volatility
GOOD vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 4.33%. This indicates that GOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOD | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.27% | 4.33% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.85% | 14.79% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.25% | 18.86% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.14% | 19.97% | +5.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.24% | 25.58% | +6.66% |
Dividends
GOOD vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
GOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, less than ARCC's 10.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 10.23% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 9.60% | 11.25% | 7.39% | 9.06% | 8.13% | 5.83% | 8.34% | 6.86% | 8.37% | 7.12% | 7.46% | 10.28% |
Financials
GOOD vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Commercial Corporation and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GOOD vs. ARCC - Profitability Comparison
GOOD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 41.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ARCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 408.00M and revenue of 581.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.2%.
GOOD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 41.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ARCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 394.00M and revenue of 581.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 67.8%.
GOOD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a net income of 6.97M and revenue of 41.91M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.
ARCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a net income of 171.00M and revenue of 581.00M, resulting in a net margin of 29.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOD and ARCC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOD has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to ARCC (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOD dropped -67.22% vs ARCC's -79.36%.
GOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOD and ARCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer