PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOD vs. BNL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOOD vs. BNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (BNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOD achieves a 19.36% return, which is significantly lower than BNL's 23.12% return.


GOOD

1D
2.19%
1M
-3.69%
YTD
19.36%
6M
22.69%
1Y
-8.13%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
-4.16%
10Y*
4.98%

BNL

1D
1.45%
1M
3.19%
YTD
23.12%
6M
25.99%
1Y
35.68%
3Y*
19.54%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOD vs. BNL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GOOD
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
19.36%-28.11%33.25%-21.63%-22.52%38.23%
BNL
Broadstone Net Lease, Inc.
23.12%17.27%-1.08%14.00%-30.75%39.13%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOD and BNL is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2021

0.58

The correlation between GOOD and BNL shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

GOOD:

$0.60

BNL:

$0.41

PE Ratio

GOOD:

20.15

BNL:

50.94

PS Ratio

GOOD:

2.57

BNL:

8.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOOD:

$165.74M

BNL:

$468.77M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOOD:

-$19.45M

BNL:

$80.71M

EBITDA (TTM)

GOOD:

$45.52M

BNL:

$332.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOD vs. BNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOD
GOOD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

BNL
BNL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOD vs. BNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) and Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (BNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOODBNLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.33

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

4.30

-4.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

10.75

-11.32

GOOD vs. BNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOD Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the BNL Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOD and BNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOD vs. BNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOD drawdown since its inception was -67.22%, which is greater than BNL's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOD and BNL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOODBNLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.22%

-43.56%

-23.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.38%

-8.34%

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.29%

-19.51%

-15.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.30%

-43.56%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.57%

-0.14%

-30.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.46%

-22.51%

+9.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.30%

3.34%

+10.96%

Volatility

GOOD vs. BNL - Volatility Comparison

Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (BNL) at 5.52%. This indicates that GOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOODBNLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

5.52%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.39%

13.25%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.18%

18.54%

+3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.07%

22.96%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.20%

23.04%

+9.16%

Dividends

GOOD vs. BNL - Dividend Comparison

GOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.91%, more than BNL's 5.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNL
Broadstone Net Lease, Inc.
5.52%6.68%7.28%6.50%6.66%4.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOOD
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
9.91%11.25%7.39%9.06%8.13%5.83%8.34%6.86%8.37%7.12%7.46%10.28%

Financials

GOOD vs. BNL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Commercial Corporation and Broadstone Net Lease, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M20222023202420252026
41.91M
121.40M
(GOOD) Total Revenue
(BNL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GOOD vs. BNL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gladstone Commercial Corporation and Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
GOOD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 41.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BNL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GOOD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 41.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

BNL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 121.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

GOOD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a net income of 6.97M and revenue of 41.91M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.

BNL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. reported a net income of -27.00K and revenue of 121.40M, resulting in a net margin of -0.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GOOD and BNL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOD has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to BNL (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOD dropped -67.22% vs BNL's -43.56%.

BNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOD and BNL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer