GOLS vs. DVXC
GOLS (Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF) and DVXC (WEBs Communication Services XLC Defined Volatility ETF) are both Communications Equities funds. GOLS is actively managed, while DVXC is passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GOLS charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for DVXC.
Performance
GOLS vs. DVXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GOLS
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DVXC
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -16.43%
- YTD
- -22.99%
- 6M
- -23.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOLS vs. DVXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 2.64% |
DVXC WEBs Communication Services XLC Defined Volatility ETF | -22.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLS and DVXC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLS vs. DVXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS) and WEBs Communication Services XLC Defined Volatility ETF (DVXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOLS vs. DVXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLS drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum DVXC drawdown of -25.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLS and DVXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLS | DVXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -25.90% | +18.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.10% | -25.90% | +21.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.00% | -7.70% | +5.70% |
Volatility
GOLS vs. DVXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLS | DVXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.63% | 26.69% | -13.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 26.69% | -13.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 26.69% | -13.06% |
GOLS vs. DVXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOLS has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than DVXC's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOLS vs. DVXC - Dividend Comparison
Neither GOLS nor DVXC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLS and DVXC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DVXC is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DVXC is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GOLS.
GOLS and DVXC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for GOLS and 0.89% for DVXC.
Find the right allocation for GOLS and DVXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer