GOLF vs. COST
GOLF (Acushnet Holdings Corp.) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. GOLF operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical), while COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, GOLF returned 15.83%/yr vs 22.12%/yr for COST. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GOLF vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOLF achieves a 23.65% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 14.24% return.
GOLF
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 14.41%
- YTD
- 23.65%
- 6M
- 16.38%
- 1Y
- 42.41%
- 3Y*
- 25.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.83%
- 10Y*
- —
COST
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- -0.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.12%
- 5Y*
- 22.12%
- 10Y*
- 22.27%
GOLF vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLF Acushnet Holdings Corp. | 23.65% | 14.09% | 13.96% | 51.02% | -18.69% | 32.71% | 27.13% | 57.63% | 2.09% | 9.84% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 14.24% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLF and COST is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2016 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GOLF and COST has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
GOLF:
$2.83
COST:
$26.51
GOLF:
34.73
COST:
37.06
GOLF:
4.83
COST:
2.90
GOLF:
2.27
COST:
1.12
GOLF:
$2.61B
COST:
$293.59B
GOLF:
$1.24B
COST:
$11.12B
GOLF:
$321.92M
COST:
$12.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLF vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
GOLF
COST
GOLF vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOLF | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.00 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | -0.10 | +2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.43 | -0.22 | +5.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOLF vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLF drawdown since its inception was -35.46%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLF and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLF | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.46% | -53.39% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.93% | -15.14% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.49% | -20.74% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.37% | -31.40% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.44% | -10.23% | +5.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -13.36% | +3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.06% | 6.67% | +0.39% |
Volatility
GOLF vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) have volatilities of 7.56% and 7.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLF | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 7.44% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.00% | 14.53% | +6.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.03% | 18.80% | +9.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.28% | 22.72% | +8.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.44% | 21.95% | +9.49% |
Dividends
GOLF vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
GOLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
GOLF Acushnet Holdings Corp. | 1.25% | 1.49% | 1.21% | 1.23% | 1.70% | 1.24% | 1.53% | 1.72% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GOLF vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acushnet Holdings Corp. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GOLF vs. COST - Profitability Comparison
GOLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 355.26M and revenue of 752.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.2%.
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
GOLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 120.15M and revenue of 752.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
GOLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 81.42M and revenue of 752.98M, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLF and COST have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOLF has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to COST (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLF dropped -35.46% vs COST's -53.39%.
GOLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOLF and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer