GOLF vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GOLF or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between GOLF and SCHG is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GOLF vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GOLF:
0.49
SCHG:
2.22
GOLF:
0.92
SCHG:
2.86
GOLF:
1.11
SCHG:
1.40
GOLF:
0.85
SCHG:
3.13
GOLF:
1.77
SCHG:
12.34
GOLF:
8.13%
SCHG:
3.14%
GOLF:
29.11%
SCHG:
17.45%
GOLF:
-35.46%
SCHG:
-34.59%
GOLF:
-7.56%
SCHG:
-2.75%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOLF achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 37.04% return.
GOLF
12.10%
1.48%
7.80%
12.07%
18.20%
N/A
SCHG
37.04%
3.40%
12.88%
37.14%
20.24%
16.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GOLF vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GOLF vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
GOLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than SCHG's 0.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLF Acushnet Holdings Corp. | 1.23% | 1.23% | 1.70% | 1.24% | 1.53% | 1.72% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
GOLF vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLF drawdown since its inception was -35.46%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLF and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GOLF vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.07%. This indicates that GOLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.