GOLF vs. WELL
GOLF (Acushnet Holdings Corp.) and WELL (Welltower Inc.) are both stocks. GOLF operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical), while WELL operates in REIT - Healthcare Facilities (Real Estate). Over the past 5 years, GOLF returned 16.26%/yr vs 25.01%/yr for WELL. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GOLF vs. WELL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GOLF having a 27.57% return and WELL slightly lower at 27.19%.
GOLF
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -13.86%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 27.57%
- 1Y
- 32.78%
- 3Y*
- 21.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.15%
WELL
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- 6M
- 25.33%
- YTD
- 27.19%
- 1Y
- 43.19%
- 3Y*
- 43.40%
- 5Y*
- 25.01%
- 10Y*
- 15.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $28.41M | $30.75M | $35.80M | |
WELL Welltower Inc. | $732.91M | $699.76M | $765.75M |
GOLF vs. WELL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLF Acushnet Holdings Corp. | 27.57% | 14.09% | 13.96% | 51.02% | -18.69% | 32.71% | 27.13% | 57.63% | 2.09% | 9.84% |
WELL Welltower Inc. | 27.19% | 49.86% | 43.07% | 41.79% | -21.18% | 36.98% | -17.19% | 23.04% | 15.31% | 0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLF and WELL is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2016 | 0.18 |
The correlation between GOLF and WELL shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GOLF:
$5.93B
WELL:
$168.93B
GOLF:
$2.83
WELL:
$2.17
GOLF:
35.72
WELL:
107.87
GOLF:
4.97
WELL:
2.39
GOLF:
2.34
WELL:
13.21
GOLF:
7.37
WELL:
3.70
GOLF:
$2.61B
WELL:
$12.66B
GOLF:
$1.24B
WELL:
$2.25B
GOLF:
$321.92M
WELL:
$3.08B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLF vs. WELL — Risk / Return Rank
GOLF
WELL
GOLF vs. WELL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Welltower Inc. (WELL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOLF | WELL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.33 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 3.52 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 8.52 | -4.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOLF vs. WELL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLF drawdown since its inception was -35.46%, smaller than the maximum WELL drawdown of -63.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLF and WELL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLF | WELL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.46% | -63.33% | +27.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.93% | -12.61% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.49% | -12.99% | -12.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.37% | -40.78% | +7.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.56% | -6.99% | -7.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -10.27% | +0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 5.20% | +1.43% |
Volatility
GOLF vs. WELL - Volatility Comparison
Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to Welltower Inc. (WELL) at 7.23%. This indicates that GOLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLF | WELL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 7.23% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.89% | 18.35% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.39% | 22.30% | +7.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 23.79% | +7.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.50% | 31.99% | -0.49% |
Dividends
GOLF vs. WELL - Dividend Comparison
GOLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than WELL's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLF Acushnet Holdings Corp. | 1.21% | 1.49% | 1.21% | 1.23% | 1.70% | 1.24% | 1.53% | 1.72% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WELL Welltower Inc. | 1.26% | 1.52% | 2.03% | 2.71% | 3.72% | 2.84% | 4.18% | 4.26% | 5.01% | 5.46% | 5.14% | 4.85% |
Financials
GOLF vs. WELL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acushnet Holdings Corp. and Welltower Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GOLF vs. WELL - Profitability Comparison
GOLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 355.26M and revenue of 752.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.2%.
WELL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Welltower Inc. reported a gross profit of -1.25B and revenue of 3.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -34.8%.
GOLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 120.15M and revenue of 752.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.
WELL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Welltower Inc. reported an operating income of 656.88M and revenue of 3.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.3%.
GOLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 81.42M and revenue of 752.98M, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
WELL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Welltower Inc. reported a net income of 445.00M and revenue of 3.59B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLF and WELL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOLF has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to WELL (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLF dropped -35.46% vs WELL's -63.33%.
WELL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOLF and WELL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer