PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLF vs. WELL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOLF vs. WELL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Welltower Inc. (WELL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLF achieves a 36.13% return, which is significantly higher than WELL's 18.09% return.


GOLF

1D
0.91%
1M
22.55%
YTD
36.13%
6M
32.44%
1Y
51.13%
3Y*
30.33%
5Y*
18.81%
10Y*

WELL

1D
2.94%
1M
0.69%
YTD
18.09%
6M
17.30%
1Y
43.41%
3Y*
44.80%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
15.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLF vs. WELL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
36.13%14.09%13.96%51.02%-18.69%32.71%27.13%57.63%2.09%9.84%
WELL
Welltower Inc.
18.09%49.86%43.07%41.79%-21.18%36.98%-17.19%23.04%15.31%0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLF and WELL is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2016

0.18

The correlation between GOLF and WELL shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GOLF:

$6.48B

WELL:

$158.08B

EPS

GOLF:

$2.83

WELL:

$2.02

PE Ratio

GOLF:

38.23

WELL:

107.86

PEG Ratio

GOLF:

5.32

WELL:

2.39

PS Ratio

GOLF:

2.50

WELL:

13.05

PB Ratio

GOLF:

7.86

WELL:

3.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOLF:

$2.61B

WELL:

$11.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOLF:

$1.24B

WELL:

$3.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

GOLF:

$321.92M

WELL:

$3.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLF vs. WELL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLF
GOLF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GOLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLF Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

WELL
WELL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
WELL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELL Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
WELL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLF vs. WELL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Welltower Inc. (WELL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOLFWELLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.46

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.25

8.44

-1.19

GOLF vs. WELL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the WELL Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLF and WELL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOLF vs. WELL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLF drawdown since its inception was -35.46%, smaller than the maximum WELL drawdown of -63.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLF and WELL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLFWELLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.46%

-63.33%

+27.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.93%

-12.61%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.49%

-12.99%

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.37%

-40.78%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.12%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-10.31%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.07%

5.16%

+1.91%

Volatility

GOLF vs. WELL - Volatility Comparison

Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Welltower Inc. (WELL) have volatilities of 9.92% and 10.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLFWELLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.92%

10.22%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.05%

17.37%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.64%

22.08%

+6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.45%

23.85%

+7.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.50%

31.94%

-0.44%

Dividends

GOLF vs. WELL - Dividend Comparison

GOLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than WELL's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
1.14%1.49%1.21%1.23%1.70%1.24%1.53%1.72%2.47%2.28%0.00%0.00%
WELL
Welltower Inc.
1.36%1.52%2.03%2.71%3.72%2.84%4.18%4.26%5.01%5.46%5.14%4.85%

Financials

GOLF vs. WELL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acushnet Holdings Corp. and Welltower Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
752.98M
3.35B
(GOLF) Total Revenue
(WELL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GOLF vs. WELL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Acushnet Holdings Corp. and Welltower Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
47.2%
0
Portfolio components
GOLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 355.26M and revenue of 752.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.2%.

WELL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Welltower Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GOLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 120.15M and revenue of 752.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

WELL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Welltower Inc. reported an operating income of 752.32M and revenue of 3.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.

GOLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 81.42M and revenue of 752.98M, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

WELL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Welltower Inc. reported a net income of 728.67M and revenue of 3.35B, resulting in a net margin of 21.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GOLF and WELL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WELL has higher volatility (10.22%) compared to GOLF (9.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLF dropped -35.46% vs WELL's -63.33%.

WELL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLF and WELL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer