PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLDX vs. FGDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOLDX vs. FGDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLDX achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than FGDIX's 4.14% return. Over the past 10 years, GOLDX has outperformed FGDIX with an annualized return of 14.52%, while FGDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.17% annualized return.


GOLDX

1D
-3.08%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
1.07%
6M
8.57%
1Y
68.25%
3Y*
45.36%
5Y*
20.27%
10Y*
14.52%

FGDIX

1D
-2.89%
1M
0.90%
YTD
4.14%
6M
10.40%
1Y
59.54%
3Y*
40.04%
5Y*
15.58%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLDX vs. FGDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
1.07%165.59%14.92%7.85%-11.02%-8.97%26.30%43.94%-14.80%6.22%
FGDIX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I
4.14%142.97%14.91%-0.39%-13.42%-10.45%26.84%35.51%-12.96%8.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLDX and FGDIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2005

0.98

The correlation between GOLDX and FGDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLDX vs. FGDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLDX
GOLDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GOLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FGDIX
FGDIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FGDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FGDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLDX vs. FGDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOLDXFGDIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

1.59

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

1.97

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.33

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.58

6.14

+0.44

GOLDX vs. FGDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FGDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLDX and FGDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOLDXFGDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.59

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.47

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.37

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.15

+0.08

Drawdowns

GOLDX vs. FGDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLDX drawdown since its inception was -73.40%, roughly equal to the maximum FGDIX drawdown of -77.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLDX and FGDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLDXFGDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.40%

-77.15%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.96%

-29.85%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.96%

-29.85%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.73%

-45.94%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.42%

-50.57%

+1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.93%

-23.73%

-2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.50%

-39.81%

+5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.79%

11.31%

+0.48%

Volatility

GOLDX vs. FGDIX - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Gold Fund (GOLDX) and Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) have volatilities of 14.29% and 14.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLDXFGDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.29%

14.89%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.80%

35.13%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.68%

43.13%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.54%

33.59%

-1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.26%

33.23%

-0.97%

GOLDX vs. FGDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOLDX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FGDIX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOLDX vs. FGDIX - Dividend Comparison

GOLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.41%, more than FGDIX's 4.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FGDIX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I
4.84%2.10%3.58%0.97%0.36%1.59%4.40%0.41%0.00%0.23%3.65%
GOLDX
Gabelli Gold Fund
15.41%15.57%2.11%1.13%0.00%0.00%1.69%0.83%0.34%0.51%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, GOLDX and FGDIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGDIX has higher volatility (14.89%) compared to GOLDX (14.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLDX dropped -73.40% vs FGDIX's -77.15%.

GOLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLDX and FGDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer