GOLD vs. FHLC

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

GOLD (Barrick Mining Corporation) is a stock, while FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GOLD vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLD achieves a 23.54% return, which is significantly higher than FHLC's 7.37% return.

GOLD

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -0.43%
• 6M: 10.49%
• YTD: 23.54%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FHLC

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 6.95%
• 6M: 4.96%
• YTD: 7.37%
• 1Y: 24.77%
• 3Y*: 10.07%
• 5Y*: 5.59%
• 10Y*: 10.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLD vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GOLD Barrick Mining Corporation	23.54%	13.01%
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	7.37%	-0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLD and FHLC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025	0.25

Return for Risk

GOLD vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FHLC

FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 59
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLD vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GOLD	FHLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.62	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.50	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.40	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.92	—

Drawdowns

GOLD vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLD drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD and FHLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOLD	FHLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.58%	-28.76%	-11.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.38%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.73%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.42%	-1.17%	-33.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.78%	-5.17%	-14.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GOLD	FHLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.21%	15.32%	+40.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.21%	15.17%	+41.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.21%	16.84%	+39.37%

Dividends

GOLD vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison

GOLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than FHLC's 1.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	1.29%	1.40%	1.51%	1.40%	1.30%	1.16%	1.45%	1.18%	1.38%	1.38%	1.40%	2.07%
GOLD Barrick Mining Corporation	0.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOLD and FHLC in my portfolio?

GOLD and FHLC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.