PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLD vs. GC=F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GOLD vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD) and Gold Futures (GC=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLD achieves a 22.50% return, which is significantly higher than GC=F's -5.25% return.


GOLD

1D
-1.71%
1M
-2.75%
6M
-19.55%
YTD
22.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

GC=F

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.74%
6M
-13.05%
YTD
-5.25%
1Y
24.46%
3Y*
28.30%
5Y*
17.72%
10Y*
11.63%
ALL TIME*
11.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$116.79M$56.64M$28.60M
$13.90M$15.32M$19.34M

GOLD vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GOLD
Barrick Mining Corporation
22.50%13.01%
GC=F
Gold Futures
-5.25%2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLD and GC=F is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLD vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOLD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GC=F
GC=F Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
GC=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GC=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
GC=F Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
GC=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
GC=F Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOLD vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD) and Gold Futures (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOLDGC=FDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

GOLD vs. GC=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOLD vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLD drawdown since its inception was -40.93%, smaller than the maximum GC=F drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD and GC=F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLDGC=FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.93%

-44.36%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.97%

-22.94%

-12.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.49%

-13.58%

-7.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.31%

Volatility

GOLD vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLDGC=FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.58%

28.14%

+27.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.58%

18.65%

+36.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.58%

16.66%

+38.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLD and GC=F have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLD and GC=F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer