GOEX vs. QYLD
GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOEX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GOEX returned 13.99%/yr vs 9.80%/yr for QYLD. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOEX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
GOEX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOEX achieves a -5.02% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, GOEX has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 13.99%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 9.80% annualized return.
GOEX
- 1D
- -4.11%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- YTD
- -5.02%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.31%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
GOEX vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | -5.02% | 179.50% | 19.38% | 1.99% | -14.63% | -14.45% | 34.98% | 36.73% | -14.84% | 12.61% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.88% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOEX and QYLD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013 | 0.15 |
The correlation between GOEX and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GOEX vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GOEX
QYLD
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
GOEX
QYLD
Communication Services
GOEX
-
QYLD
Consumer Cyclical
GOEX
-
QYLD
Consumer Defensive
GOEX
-
QYLD
Energy
GOEX
-
QYLD
Financial Services
GOEX
-
QYLD
Healthcare
GOEX
-
QYLD
Industrials
GOEX
-
QYLD
Real Estate
GOEX
-
QYLD
Technology
GOEX
-
QYLD
Utilities
GOEX
-
QYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOEX vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
GOEX
QYLD
GOEX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOEX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.63 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 4.84 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 28.36 | -23.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOEX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 2.80 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.58 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.63 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.59 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
GOEX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOEX drawdown since its inception was -88.83%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOEX and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOEX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.83% | -24.75% | -64.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.78% | -4.97% | -27.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.78% | -19.06% | -13.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -24.61% | -22.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.66% | -24.75% | -28.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.90% | -0.06% | -29.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.59% | -3.84% | -59.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.04% | 0.85% | +12.19% |
Volatility
GOEX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a higher volatility of 14.62% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that GOEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOEX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.62% | 1.85% | +12.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.87% | 7.12% | +32.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.13% | 8.58% | +40.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.00% | 14.70% | +24.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.97% | 15.49% | +24.48% |
GOEX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOEX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
GOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | 2.19% | 2.08% | 2.46% | 0.05% | 1.04% | 2.35% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.91% | 11.70% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOEX and QYLD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOEX has higher volatility (14.62%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOEX dropped -88.83% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
On 10-year performance, GOEX leads with 13.99% vs 9.80% for QYLD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOEX.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 2.19% for GOEX.
GOEX is categorized as Materials, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. GOEX tracks Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GOEX and 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOEX and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer