PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOEX vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOEX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOEX achieves a -5.02% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, GOEX has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 13.99%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 9.80% annualized return.


GOEX

1D
-4.11%
1M
-3.45%
YTD
-5.02%
6M
2.89%
1Y
64.25%
3Y*
46.31%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
13.99%

QYLD

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.97%
1Y
23.93%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOEX vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOEX
Global X Gold Explorers ETF
-5.02%179.50%19.38%1.99%-14.63%-14.45%34.98%36.73%-14.84%12.61%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.88%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between GOEX and QYLD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013

0.15

The correlation between GOEX and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GOEX vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GOEX
QYLD

Basic Materials

100.0%
1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Basic Materials

GOEX
100.0%
QYLD
1.1%

Communication Services

GOEX

-

QYLD
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GOEX

-

QYLD
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

GOEX

-

QYLD
7.7%

Energy

GOEX

-

QYLD
0.6%

Financial Services

GOEX

-

QYLD
0.2%

Healthcare

GOEX

-

QYLD
4.2%

Industrials

GOEX

-

QYLD
2.8%

Real Estate

GOEX

-

QYLD
0.1%

Technology

GOEX

-

QYLD
53.8%

Utilities

GOEX

-

QYLD
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOEX vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOEX
GOEX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GOEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GOEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOEX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOEXQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.63

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

4.84

-2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

28.36

-23.42

GOEX vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOEX and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOEXQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

2.80

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.58

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.63

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.59

-0.57

Drawdowns

GOEX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOEX drawdown since its inception was -88.83%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOEX and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOEXQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.83%

-24.75%

-64.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.78%

-4.97%

-27.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.78%

-19.06%

-13.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.16%

-24.61%

-22.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.66%

-24.75%

-28.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.90%

-0.06%

-29.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.59%

-3.84%

-59.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.04%

0.85%

+12.19%

Volatility

GOEX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a higher volatility of 14.62% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that GOEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOEXQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.62%

1.85%

+12.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.87%

7.12%

+32.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.13%

8.58%

+40.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.00%

14.70%

+24.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.97%

15.49%

+24.48%

GOEX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOEX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

GOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOEX
Global X Gold Explorers ETF
2.19%2.08%2.46%0.05%1.04%2.35%2.62%1.60%0.00%0.00%38.91%11.70%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOEX and QYLD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOEX has higher volatility (14.62%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOEX dropped -88.83% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

On 10-year performance, GOEX leads with 13.99% vs 9.80% for QYLD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOEX.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 2.19% for GOEX.

GOEX is categorized as Materials, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. GOEX tracks Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GOEX and 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOEX and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer