GOEX vs. EWS
GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) and EWS (iShares MSCI Singapore ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOEX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return, while EWS is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Singapore Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GOEX returned 12.61%/yr vs 7.88%/yr for EWS. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOEX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWS.
Performance
GOEX vs. EWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOEX achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly lower than EWS's 5.96% return. Over the past 10 years, GOEX has outperformed EWS with an annualized return of 12.61%, while EWS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.88% annualized return.
GOEX
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- -17.89%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -9.61%
- 1Y
- 52.15%
- 3Y*
- 44.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
EWS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 7.68%
- 1Y
- 18.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
GOEX vs. EWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | -10.45% | 179.50% | 19.38% | 1.99% | -14.63% | -14.45% | 34.98% | 36.73% | -14.84% | 12.61% |
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 5.96% | 31.35% | 22.10% | 6.15% | -9.80% | 5.47% | -8.47% | 14.54% | -11.34% | 34.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOEX and EWS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2010 | 0.31 |
The correlation between GOEX and EWS shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GOEX vs. EWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GOEX
EWS
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
GOEX
EWS
-
Communication Services
GOEX
-
EWS
Consumer Cyclical
GOEX
-
EWS
Consumer Defensive
GOEX
-
EWS
Energy
GOEX
-
EWS
-
Financial Services
GOEX
-
EWS
Healthcare
GOEX
-
EWS
-
Industrials
GOEX
-
EWS
Real Estate
GOEX
-
EWS
Technology
GOEX
-
EWS
Utilities
GOEX
-
EWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOEX vs. EWS — Risk / Return Rank
GOEX
EWS
GOEX vs. EWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOEX | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.24 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 5.40 | -1.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOEX vs. EWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOEX drawdown since its inception was -88.83%, which is greater than EWS's maximum drawdown of -75.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOEX and EWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOEX | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.83% | -75.13% | -13.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.64% | -7.82% | -31.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.64% | -16.34% | -23.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -29.06% | -18.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.66% | -40.84% | -12.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.91% | -2.77% | -31.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.52% | -21.98% | -41.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.30% | 3.23% | +11.07% |
Volatility
GOEX vs. EWS - Volatility Comparison
Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a higher volatility of 17.04% compared to iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) at 5.05%. This indicates that GOEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOEX | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.04% | 5.05% | +11.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.66% | 12.11% | +29.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.58% | 15.24% | +35.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.35% | 17.34% | +22.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.12% | 18.04% | +22.08% |
GOEX vs. EWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EWS's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOEX vs. EWS - Dividend Comparison
GOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than EWS's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.87% | 4.10% | 4.28% | 6.50% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | 2.32% | 2.08% | 2.46% | 0.05% | 1.04% | 2.35% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.91% | 11.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOEX and EWS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOEX has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to EWS (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOEX dropped -88.83% vs EWS's -75.13%.
On 10-year performance, GOEX leads with 12.61% vs 7.88% for EWS. On fees, EWS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWS has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOEX.
EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 2.32% for GOEX.
GOEX is categorized as Materials, while EWS is Asia Pacific Equities. GOEX tracks Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return, while EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GOEX and 0.50% for EWS.
EWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOEX and EWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer