PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOAU vs. ICBMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GOAU vs. ICBMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU) and ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GOAU vs. ICBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOAU
US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF
9.07%126.68%13.78%10.67%-11.66%-9.23%14.13%54.17%-11.88%7.92%
ICBMX
ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund
15.65%15.95%21.25%11.02%0.50%30.63%5.53%22.11%-17.38%15.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOAU achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than ICBMX's 15.65% return.


GOAU

1D
4.64%
1M
-17.24%
YTD
9.07%
6M
14.84%
1Y
87.28%
3Y*
39.02%
5Y*
20.93%
10Y*

ICBMX

1D
2.40%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
15.65%
6M
18.51%
1Y
42.47%
3Y*
21.21%
5Y*
14.05%
10Y*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GOAU vs. ICBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOAU has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ICBMX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GOAU vs. ICBMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOAU
GOAU Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GOAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOAU Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GOAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ICBMX
ICBMX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ICBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ICBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOAU vs. ICBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU) and ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOAUICBMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

1.72

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.17

2.43

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.59

+0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.55

11.22

-1.66

GOAU vs. ICBMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the ICBMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOAU and ICBMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOAUICBMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.72

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.68

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.29

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between GOAU and ICBMX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GOAU vs. ICBMX - Dividend Comparison

GOAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than ICBMX's 8.65% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOAU
US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF
0.86%0.94%2.11%0.99%1.55%1.28%0.74%0.16%0.47%0.27%0.00%0.00%
ICBMX
ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund
8.65%10.01%17.24%7.07%11.07%1.32%0.32%1.55%21.58%1.19%0.53%7.78%

Drawdowns

GOAU vs. ICBMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOAU drawdown since its inception was -55.41%, smaller than the maximum ICBMX drawdown of -63.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOAU and ICBMX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GOAUICBMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.41%

-63.92%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.15%

-16.07%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.52%

-26.49%

-22.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.43%

-3.46%

-13.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.77%

-17.97%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.06%

3.71%

+5.35%

Volatility

GOAU vs. ICBMX - Volatility Comparison

US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU) has a higher volatility of 17.04% compared to ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) at 6.79%. This indicates that GOAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GOAUICBMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.04%

6.79%

+10.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.44%

15.91%

+23.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.73%

25.07%

+21.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.96%

20.88%

+15.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.37%

22.29%

+13.08%