GOAU vs. ICBMX
Compare and contrast key facts about US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU) and ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX).
GOAU is a passively managed fund by US Global that tracks the performance of the U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners Index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2017. ICBMX is managed by ICON Funds. It was launched on May 4, 1997.
Performance
GOAU vs. ICBMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GOAU vs. ICBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOAU US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF | 9.07% | 126.68% | 13.78% | 10.67% | -11.66% | -9.23% | 14.13% | 54.17% | -11.88% | 7.92% |
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 15.65% | 15.95% | 21.25% | 11.02% | 0.50% | 30.63% | 5.53% | 22.11% | -17.38% | 15.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOAU achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than ICBMX's 15.65% return.
GOAU
- 1D
- 4.64%
- 1M
- -17.24%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 14.84%
- 1Y
- 87.28%
- 3Y*
- 39.02%
- 5Y*
- 20.93%
- 10Y*
- —
ICBMX
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 42.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 14.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GOAU vs. ICBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOAU has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ICBMX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GOAU vs. ICBMX — Risk / Return Rank
GOAU
ICBMX
GOAU vs. ICBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU) and ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOAU | ICBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 1.72 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 2.43 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 2.59 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.55 | 11.22 | -1.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOAU | ICBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.72 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.68 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.29 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between GOAU and ICBMX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GOAU vs. ICBMX - Dividend Comparison
GOAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than ICBMX's 8.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOAU US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF | 0.86% | 0.94% | 2.11% | 0.99% | 1.55% | 1.28% | 0.74% | 0.16% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 8.65% | 10.01% | 17.24% | 7.07% | 11.07% | 1.32% | 0.32% | 1.55% | 21.58% | 1.19% | 0.53% | 7.78% |
Drawdowns
GOAU vs. ICBMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOAU drawdown since its inception was -55.41%, smaller than the maximum ICBMX drawdown of -63.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOAU and ICBMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOAU | ICBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.41% | -63.92% | +8.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.15% | -16.07% | -15.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.52% | -26.49% | -22.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.43% | -3.46% | -13.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.77% | -17.97% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.06% | 3.71% | +5.35% |
Volatility
GOAU vs. ICBMX - Volatility Comparison
US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU) has a higher volatility of 17.04% compared to ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) at 6.79%. This indicates that GOAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GOAU | ICBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.04% | 6.79% | +10.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.44% | 15.91% | +23.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.73% | 25.07% | +21.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.96% | 20.88% | +15.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.37% | 22.29% | +13.08% |