GOAU vs. GDGB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU) and VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GDGB.L).
GOAU and GDGB.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GOAU is a passively managed fund by US Global Investors that tracks the performance of the U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners Index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2017. GDGB.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on Mar 25, 2015. Both GOAU and GDGB.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GOAU or GDGB.L.
Correlation
The correlation between GOAU and GDGB.L is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GOAU vs. GDGB.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GOAU:
1.65
GDGB.L:
1.53
GOAU:
2.16
GDGB.L:
2.15
GOAU:
1.29
GDGB.L:
1.26
GOAU:
2.05
GDGB.L:
2.21
GOAU:
6.60
GDGB.L:
5.91
GOAU:
8.21%
GDGB.L:
7.85%
GOAU:
32.82%
GDGB.L:
30.37%
GOAU:
-55.41%
GDGB.L:
-40.80%
GOAU:
-0.50%
GDGB.L:
-3.06%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOAU achieves a 47.75% return, which is significantly higher than GDGB.L's 42.03% return.
GOAU
47.75%
16.43%
22.38%
50.08%
13.99%
N/A
GDGB.L
42.03%
10.53%
17.61%
42.33%
11.09%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GOAU vs. GDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOAU has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GDGB.L's 0.53% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GOAU vs. GDGB.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GOAU
GDGB.L
GOAU vs. GDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU) and VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GOAU vs. GDGB.L - Dividend Comparison
GOAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, while GDGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOAU US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF | 1.43% | 2.11% | 0.99% | 1.55% | 1.28% | 0.74% | 0.16% | 0.47% | 0.13% |
GDGB.L VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GOAU vs. GDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOAU drawdown since its inception was -55.41%, which is greater than GDGB.L's maximum drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOAU and GDGB.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GOAU vs. GDGB.L - Volatility Comparison
US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU) and VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GDGB.L) have volatilities of 14.65% and 14.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.