PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNRC vs. CDNS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GNRC vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNRC achieves a 92.39% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's 23.16% return. Over the past 10 years, GNRC has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 21.41%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 31.77% annualized return.


GNRC

1D
1.95%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
92.39%
6M
63.21%
1Y
110.36%
3Y*
28.41%
5Y*
-5.56%
10Y*
21.41%

CDNS

1D
0.32%
1M
10.86%
YTD
23.16%
6M
19.10%
1Y
28.32%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
24.39%
10Y*
31.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNRC vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GNRC
Generac Holdings Inc.
92.39%-12.05%19.97%28.39%-71.40%54.75%126.08%102.39%0.36%21.55%
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
23.16%4.03%10.31%69.55%-13.80%36.59%96.70%59.52%3.97%65.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GNRC and CDNS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.38

The correlation between GNRC and CDNS shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.40 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GNRC:

$15.54B

CDNS:

$105.37B

EPS

GNRC:

$3.20

CDNS:

$4.28

PE Ratio

GNRC:

81.93

CDNS:

89.86

PS Ratio

GNRC:

3.58

CDNS:

19.03

PB Ratio

GNRC:

5.81

CDNS:

12.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

GNRC:

$4.33B

CDNS:

$5.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GNRC:

$1.65B

CDNS:

$4.91B

EBITDA (TTM)

GNRC:

$461.56M

CDNS:

$1.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNRC vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNRC
GNRC Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GNRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNRC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GNRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNRC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CDNS
CDNS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CDNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDNS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CDNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDNS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNRC vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GNRCCDNSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.15

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

0.87

+2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

1.84

+5.33

GNRC vs. CDNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNRC Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNRC and CDNS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GNRC vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNRC drawdown since its inception was -83.75%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNRC and CDNS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNRCCDNSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.75%

-93.13%

+9.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.77%

-28.85%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.76%

-29.05%

-18.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.75%

-29.59%

-54.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.75%

-32.12%

-51.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.13%

-7.55%

-40.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.37%

-39.62%

+9.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.61%

13.63%

+0.98%

Volatility

GNRC vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) has a higher volatility of 19.80% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 16.52%. This indicates that GNRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNRCCDNSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.80%

16.52%

+3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.79%

31.73%

+8.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.84%

38.94%

+14.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.23%

36.17%

+16.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.22%

34.12%

+11.10%

Dividends

GNRC vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

Neither GNRC nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GNRC vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Generac Holdings Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
1.06B
1.47B
(GNRC) Total Revenue
(CDNS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GNRC vs. CDNS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Generac Holdings Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
38.7%
95.9%
Portfolio components
GNRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Generac Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 410.24M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.

CDNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

GNRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Generac Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 117.29M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

CDNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 431.33M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

GNRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Generac Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 73.25M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.

CDNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 335.66M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GNRC and CDNS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GNRC has higher volatility (19.80%) compared to CDNS (16.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNRC dropped -83.75% vs CDNS's -93.13%.

GNRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNRC and CDNS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer