GNRC vs. VB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB).

VB is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.

Performance

GNRC vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GNRC vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GNRC Generac Holdings Inc.	43.24%	-12.05%	19.97%	28.39%	-71.40%	54.75%	126.08%	102.39%	0.36%	21.55%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.92%	8.87%	14.17%	18.22%	-17.51%	17.57%	19.19%	27.34%	-9.34%	16.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNRC achieves a 43.24% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GNRC has outperformed VB with an annualized return of 17.90%, while VB has yielded a comparatively lower 10.51% annualized return.

GNRC

• 1D: 5.30%
• 1M: -13.33%
• YTD: 43.24%
• 6M: 16.68%
• 1Y: 54.23%
• 3Y*: 21.83%
• 5Y*: -9.61%
• 10Y*: 17.90%

VB

• 1D: 3.18%
• 1M: -5.13%
• YTD: 1.92%
• 6M: 3.76%
• 1Y: 19.75%
• 3Y*: 13.04%
• 5Y*: 5.35%
• 10Y*: 10.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GNRC vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNRC

GNRC Risk / Return Rank: 73
GNRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GNRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GNRC Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GNRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GNRC Martin Ratio Rank: 72

VB

VB Risk / Return Rank: 59
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 55
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNRC vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GNRC	VB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	0.91	+0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	1.41	+0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.19	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	1.39	+0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.67	5.97	-2.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GNRC vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNRC Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNRC and VB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GNRC	VB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	0.91	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.19	0.26	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.49	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.42	-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between GNRC and VB is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GNRC vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

GNRC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GNRC Generac Holdings Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.34%	1.33%	1.30%	1.55%	1.59%	1.24%	1.14%	1.39%	1.67%	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%

Drawdowns

GNRC vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNRC drawdown since its inception was -83.75%, which is greater than VB's maximum drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNRC and VB.

Drawdown Indicators

	GNRC	VB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.75%	-59.56%	-24.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.77%	-14.29%	-18.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.75%	-28.15%	-55.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.75%	-42.05%	-41.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.38%	-6.08%	-55.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.56%	-8.49%	-29.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.63%	3.32%	+11.31%

Volatility

GNRC vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) has a higher volatility of 13.42% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 6.84%. This indicates that GNRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GNRC	VB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.42%	6.84%	+6.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.69%	12.60%	+24.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.88%	21.86%	+30.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.41%	20.78%	+30.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.55%	21.40%	+23.15%