GNR vs. CCNR
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR).
GNR and CCNR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GNR is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2010. CCNR is an actively managed fund by ALPS. It was launched on Jul 10, 2024.
Performance
GNR vs. CCNR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GNR vs. CCNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 19.84% | 28.68% | -10.03% |
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 21.61% | 46.48% | -8.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GNR achieves a 19.84% return, which is significantly lower than CCNR's 21.61% return.
GNR
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 19.84%
- 6M
- 27.71%
- 1Y
- 43.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
CCNR
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 21.61%
- 6M
- 32.84%
- 1Y
- 69.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GNR vs. CCNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GNR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CCNR's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GNR vs. CCNR — Risk / Return Rank
GNR
CCNR
GNR vs. CCNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GNR | CCNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | 3.12 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.71 | 3.68 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.56 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 4.68 | -1.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.59 | 25.78 | -10.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GNR | CCNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 3.12 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 1.63 | -1.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between GNR and CCNR is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GNR vs. CCNR - Dividend Comparison
GNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than CCNR's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 2.31% | 2.76% | 4.73% | 3.37% | 4.37% | 3.44% | 2.78% | 3.84% | 3.51% | 2.40% | 2.06% | 4.59% |
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 2.86% | 3.48% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GNR vs. CCNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNR drawdown since its inception was -51.37%, which is greater than CCNR's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNR and CCNR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GNR | CCNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.37% | -20.06% | -31.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.80% | -15.00% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | -2.12% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.10% | -3.81% | -11.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.73% | +0.10% |
Volatility
GNR vs. CCNR - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) have volatilities of 5.51% and 5.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GNR | CCNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 5.32% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.76% | 14.70% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 22.40% | -1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 20.39% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 20.39% | +1.62% |