PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNMA vs. NEAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GNMA vs. NEAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) and iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNMA achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than NEAR's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GNMA has underperformed NEAR with an annualized return of 1.23%, while NEAR has yielded a comparatively higher 2.85% annualized return.


GNMA

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.81%
1Y
6.56%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
0.53%
10Y*
1.23%

NEAR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.73%
6M
1.15%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
2.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNMA vs. NEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GNMA
iShares GNMA Bond ETF
0.56%8.25%1.07%5.34%-10.83%-1.86%3.51%5.85%0.85%1.74%
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
0.73%5.90%5.09%7.42%0.41%0.32%1.39%3.55%1.71%1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GNMA and NEAR is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2013

0.36

Over the past year, GNMA and NEAR have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNMA vs. NEAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNMA
GNMA Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GNMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNMA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GNMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNMA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

NEAR
NEAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NEAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNMA vs. NEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) and iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GNMANEARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.66

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

3.81

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.05

17.49

-9.44

GNMA vs. NEAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the NEAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNMA and NEAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GNMANEARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

3.18

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

2.90

-2.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

1.14

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.09

-0.84

Drawdowns

GNMA vs. NEAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNMA drawdown since its inception was -17.09%, which is greater than NEAR's maximum drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNMA and NEAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNMANEARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.09%

-9.61%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

-1.13%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.13%

-1.16%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.83%

-1.32%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.09%

-9.61%

-7.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-0.09%

-1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-0.16%

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.25%

+0.57%

Volatility

GNMA vs. NEAR - Volatility Comparison

iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) at 0.37%. This indicates that GNMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNMANEARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

0.37%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

1.00%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30%

1.36%

+2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.61%

1.34%

+5.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.13%

2.50%

+2.63%

GNMA vs. NEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GNMA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GNMA vs. NEAR - Dividend Comparison

GNMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than NEAR's 4.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GNMA
iShares GNMA Bond ETF
4.24%4.19%4.15%3.43%2.01%0.64%1.89%2.61%2.41%2.15%1.89%1.50%
NEAR
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
4.44%4.54%5.00%4.59%1.78%0.76%1.53%2.69%2.25%1.52%1.07%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


GNMA and NEAR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GNMA has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to NEAR (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNMA dropped -17.09% vs NEAR's -9.61%.

On 10-year performance, NEAR leads with 2.85% vs 1.23% for GNMA. On fees, GNMA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, NEAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NEAR has performed better with a 2.85% return vs 1.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GNMA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NEAR.

NEAR has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 4.24% for GNMA.

GNMA is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while NEAR is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GNMA and 0.25% for NEAR.

NEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNMA and NEAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer