GNL vs. SRLN
GNL (Global Net Lease, Inc.) is a stock, while SRLN (SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Leveraged Loan Index. Over the past 10 years, GNL returned 1.14%/yr vs 4.52%/yr for SRLN. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GNL vs. SRLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GNL achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly higher than SRLN's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GNL has underperformed SRLN with an annualized return of 1.14%, while SRLN has yielded a comparatively higher 4.52% annualized return.
GNL
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 20.37%
- 1Y
- 35.89%
- 3Y*
- 11.33%
- 5Y*
- -2.84%
- 10Y*
- 1.14%
SRLN
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.83%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
GNL vs. SRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNL Global Net Lease, Inc. | 13.79% | 32.44% | -15.34% | -8.95% | -7.46% | -2.35% | -6.07% | 26.16% | -4.53% | -4.22% |
SRLN SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 0.73% | 6.77% | 8.43% | 11.62% | -5.30% | 4.49% | 3.13% | 10.03% | -0.66% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between GNL and SRLN is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2015 | 0.29 |
The correlation between GNL and SRLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GNL vs. SRLN — Risk / Return Rank
GNL
SRLN
GNL vs. SRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Net Lease, Inc. (GNL) and SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GNL | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.45 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 1.73 | +2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | 6.41 | +2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GNL | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.95 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 1.19 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.75 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.70 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
GNL vs. SRLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNL drawdown since its inception was -58.38%, which is greater than SRLN's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNL and SRLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GNL | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.38% | -22.29% | -36.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | -3.26% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.59% | -4.26% | -31.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.09% | -7.93% | -44.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.38% | -22.29% | -36.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.97% | -0.07% | -13.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.50% | -1.10% | -17.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 0.88% | +3.04% |
Volatility
GNL vs. SRLN - Volatility Comparison
Global Net Lease, Inc. (GNL) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) at 0.44%. This indicates that GNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GNL | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 0.44% | +4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.24% | 2.64% | +11.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.94% | 2.89% | +20.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.80% | 3.91% | +24.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.34% | 6.06% | +27.28% |
Dividends
GNL vs. SRLN - Dividend Comparison
GNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, more than SRLN's 7.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNL Global Net Lease, Inc. | 8.09% | 9.83% | 16.15% | 15.62% | 12.73% | 10.47% | 10.11% | 8.75% | 12.09% | 9.77% | 9.07% | 4.64% |
SRLN SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 7.49% | 7.67% | 8.58% | 8.44% | 5.72% | 4.45% | 4.91% | 5.39% | 4.98% | 4.01% | 3.94% | 4.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GNL and SRLN have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GNL has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to SRLN (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNL dropped -58.38% vs SRLN's -22.29%.
SRLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GNL and SRLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer