PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNL vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GNL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Net Lease, Inc. (GNL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNL achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GNL has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 1.70%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.82% annualized return.


GNL

1D
-1.53%
1M
-5.05%
YTD
9.43%
6M
11.37%
1Y
34.96%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
-2.25%
10Y*
1.70%

VOO

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
8.09%
6M
6.78%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
15.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GNL
Global Net Lease, Inc.
9.43%32.44%-15.34%-8.95%-7.46%-2.35%-6.07%26.16%-4.53%-4.22%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.09%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GNL and VOO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2015

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between GNL and VOO has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNL
GNL Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
GNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNL Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Net Lease, Inc. (GNL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GNLVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

2.50

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.76

11.08

-2.32

GNL vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNL Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNL and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GNL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNL drawdown since its inception was -58.38%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNL and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNLVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.38%

-33.99%

-24.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

-8.90%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.59%

-18.69%

-16.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.87%

-24.52%

-25.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.38%

-33.99%

-24.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.27%

-3.23%

-14.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.86%

-3.68%

-16.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

2.01%

+1.99%

Volatility

GNL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Global Net Lease, Inc. (GNL) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.75%. This indicates that GNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNLVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

4.75%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

9.77%

+4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

12.39%

+10.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.68%

16.91%

+11.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.26%

18.02%

+15.24%

Dividends

GNL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

GNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.42%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GNL
Global Net Lease, Inc.
8.42%9.83%16.15%15.62%12.73%10.47%10.11%8.75%12.09%9.77%9.07%4.64%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


GNL and VOO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GNL has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to VOO (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNL dropped -58.38% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNL and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer