GNL vs. ABR
GNL (Global Net Lease, Inc.) and ABR (Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — GNL in REIT - Diversified, ABR in REIT - Mortgage. Over the past 10 years, GNL returned 0.93%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for ABR. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GNL vs. ABR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GNL achieves a 11.61% return, which is significantly higher than ABR's -27.11% return. Over the past 10 years, GNL has underperformed ABR with an annualized return of 0.93%, while ABR has yielded a comparatively higher 7.91% annualized return.
GNL
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 11.61%
- 6M
- 16.49%
- 1Y
- 31.55%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- -3.21%
- 10Y*
- 0.93%
ABR
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- -30.75%
- YTD
- -27.11%
- 6M
- -37.77%
- 1Y
- -38.26%
- 3Y*
- -17.08%
- 5Y*
- -12.88%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
GNL vs. ABR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNL Global Net Lease, Inc. | 11.61% | 32.44% | -15.34% | -8.95% | -7.46% | -2.35% | -6.07% | 26.16% | -4.53% | -4.22% |
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. | -27.11% | -36.65% | 3.16% | 29.73% | -20.73% | 39.42% | 10.04% | 55.19% | 30.04% | 26.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between GNL and ABR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2015 | 0.42 |
The correlation between GNL and ABR shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GNL:
$1.97B
ABR:
$1.12B
GNL:
-$0.19
ABR:
$0.57
GNL:
4.28
ABR:
1.19
GNL:
1.26
ABR:
0.48
GNL:
$472.16M
ABR:
$940.70M
GNL:
$333.10M
ABR:
$829.57M
GNL:
$330.41M
ABR:
$878.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GNL vs. ABR — Risk / Return Rank
GNL
ABR
GNL vs. ABR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Net Lease, Inc. (GNL) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GNL | ABR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.84 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | -0.72 | +4.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | -1.43 | +9.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GNL | ABR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | -0.94 | +2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | -0.35 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.20 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.05 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
GNL vs. ABR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNL drawdown since its inception was -58.38%, smaller than the maximum ABR drawdown of -97.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNL and ABR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GNL | ABR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.38% | -97.76% | +39.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | -53.05% | +43.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.59% | -57.96% | +22.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.09% | -57.96% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.38% | -72.76% | +14.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.62% | -57.96% | +42.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.50% | -41.86% | +23.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 26.77% | -22.85% |
Volatility
GNL vs. ABR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global Net Lease, Inc. (GNL) is 4.70%, while Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) has a volatility of 21.37%. This indicates that GNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GNL | ABR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.70% | 21.37% | -16.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.18% | 33.44% | -19.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.87% | 40.99% | -18.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.78% | 37.09% | -8.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.34% | 40.39% | -7.05% |
Dividends
GNL vs. ABR - Dividend Comparison
GNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.25%, less than ABR's 20.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. | 20.19% | 17.14% | 12.42% | 11.07% | 11.68% | 7.53% | 8.67% | 7.94% | 11.22% | 8.33% | 8.31% | 8.11% |
GNL Global Net Lease, Inc. | 8.25% | 9.83% | 16.15% | 15.62% | 12.73% | 10.47% | 10.11% | 8.75% | 12.09% | 9.77% | 9.07% | 4.64% |
Financials
GNL vs. ABR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Net Lease, Inc. and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GNL vs. ABR - Profitability Comparison
GNL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Net Lease, Inc. reported a gross profit of 96.36M and revenue of 109.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.2%.
ABR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of -21.94M and revenue of 25.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -85.3%.
GNL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Net Lease, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.94M and revenue of 109.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.3%.
ABR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.06M and revenue of 25.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.
GNL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Net Lease, Inc. reported a net income of -5.08M and revenue of 109.29M, resulting in a net margin of -4.7%.
ABR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 12.92M and revenue of 25.74M, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GNL and ABR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABR has higher volatility (21.37%) compared to GNL (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNL dropped -58.38% vs ABR's -97.76%.
GNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GNL and ABR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer