PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMWZX vs. FRQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMWZX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund (GMWZX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GMWZX

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.09%
6M
3.85%
YTD
5.19%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
4.97%
10Y*
7.06%

FRQHX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMWZX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GMWZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund
5.19%12.82%8.88%12.64%-14.42%8.94%10.70%5.62%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.71%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between GMWZX and FRQHX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.85

The correlation between GMWZX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMWZX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMWZX
GMWZX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GMWZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMWZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMWZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GMWZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMWZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMWZX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund (GMWZX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMWZXFRQHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

GMWZX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMWZX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMWZXFRQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

Volatility

GMWZX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMWZXFRQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.99%

GMWZX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMWZX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMWZX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

GMWZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, more than FRQHX's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.25%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GMWZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund
6.19%6.51%7.59%3.19%7.34%4.83%3.88%3.78%6.58%3.93%3.35%16.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMWZX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMWZX and FRQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer