GMWZX vs. GLDYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GMWZX (GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund) and GLDYX (GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - GMWZX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by GuideStone Funds, while GLDYX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by GuideStone Funds. Over the past 10 years, GMWZX returned 7.34%/yr vs 2.27%/yr for GLDYX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GMWZX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for GLDYX.

Performance

GMWZX vs. GLDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund (GMWZX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMWZX achieves a 5.94% return, which is significantly higher than GLDYX's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, GMWZX has outperformed GLDYX with an annualized return of 7.34%, while GLDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.

GMWZX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 2.79%
• YTD: 5.94%
• 6M: 6.35%
• 1Y: 15.33%
• 3Y*: 11.54%
• 5Y*: 5.44%
• 10Y*: 7.34%

GLDYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 6M: 1.04%
• 1Y: 4.08%
• 3Y*: 4.89%
• 5Y*: 2.13%
• 10Y*: 2.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMWZX vs. GLDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMWZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund	5.94%	12.82%	8.88%	12.64%	-14.42%	8.94%	10.70%	18.19%	-4.90%	14.93%
GLDYX GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund	0.65%	5.66%	4.81%	5.09%	-4.42%	-0.47%	3.39%	4.00%	1.83%	1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GMWZX and GLDYX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007	0.02

Over the past year, GMWZX and GLDYX have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

GMWZX vs. GLDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMWZX

GMWZX Risk / Return Rank: 61
GMWZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
GMWZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
GMWZX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
GMWZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
GMWZX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

GLDYX

GLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 89
GLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
GLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
GLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMWZX vs. GLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund (GMWZX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMWZX	GLDYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.97	-0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	4.83	-1.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.71	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	3.95	-1.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.56	16.50	-3.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GMWZX vs. GLDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMWZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the GLDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMWZX and GLDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMWZX	GLDYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.97	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	1.17	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	1.47	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.66	-0.24

Drawdowns

GMWZX vs. GLDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMWZX drawdown since its inception was -51.44%, which is greater than GLDYX's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMWZX and GLDYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMWZX	GLDYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.44%	-11.73%	-39.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.59%	-1.04%	-4.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.91%	-1.04%	-6.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.61%	-6.68%	-12.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.65%	-6.68%	-14.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.10%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.27%	-2.16%	-4.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.23%	0.25%	+0.98%

Volatility

GMWZX vs. GLDYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund (GMWZX) has a higher volatility of 2.27% compared to GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) at 0.44%. This indicates that GMWZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMWZX	GLDYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.27%	0.44%	+1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.42%	1.01%	+4.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.68%	1.38%	+5.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.45%	1.82%	+6.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.05%	1.55%	+7.50%

GMWZX vs. GLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMWZX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDYX's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMWZX vs. GLDYX - Dividend Comparison

GMWZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, more than GLDYX's 4.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLDYX GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund	4.10%	4.32%	4.31%	3.36%	1.72%	1.02%	1.70%	2.49%	2.87%	1.60%	1.66%	1.03%
GMWZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund	6.15%	6.51%	7.59%	3.19%	7.34%	4.83%	3.88%	3.78%	6.58%	3.93%	3.35%	16.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMWZX and GLDYX in my portfolio?

GMWZX and GLDYX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMWZX or GLDYX?

GMWZX has higher volatility (2.27%) compared to GLDYX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMWZX dropped -51.44% vs GLDYX's -11.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.