PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMWEX vs. GMLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMWEX vs. GMLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX) and GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMWEX achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly lower than GMLVX's 29.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GMWEX has underperformed GMLVX with an annualized return of 8.60%, while GMLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.46% annualized return.


GMWEX

1D
-0.69%
1M
1.25%
YTD
6.52%
6M
9.71%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
8.60%

GMLVX

1D
2.77%
1M
11.54%
YTD
29.70%
6M
32.69%
1Y
56.36%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMWEX vs. GMLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMWEX
GuideMark World ex-US Fund
6.52%33.60%5.36%15.97%-16.19%11.70%8.58%20.02%-14.12%25.97%
GMLVX
GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund
29.70%30.29%7.90%11.13%-20.58%-0.51%15.41%17.72%-15.18%38.23%

Correlation

The correlation between GMWEX and GMLVX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.77

The correlation between GMWEX and GMLVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMWEX vs. GMLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMWEX
GMWEX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GMWEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMWEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMWEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GMWEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMWEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

GMLVX
GMLVX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GMLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GMLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMWEX vs. GMLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX) and GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMWEXGMLVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

3.09

-1.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

3.93

-1.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.58

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

3.89

-1.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.65

15.82

-8.18

GMWEX vs. GMLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMWEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the GMLVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMWEX and GMLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMWEXGMLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

3.09

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.49

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.60

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.25

-0.10

Drawdowns

GMWEX vs. GMLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMWEX drawdown since its inception was -70.00%, roughly equal to the maximum GMLVX drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMWEX and GMLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMWEXGMLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.00%

-70.50%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-14.40%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.52%

-16.31%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.28%

-35.37%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

-39.40%

+3.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

0.00%

-1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-18.18%

-12.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

3.54%

-0.84%

Volatility

GMWEX vs. GMLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX) is 4.19%, while GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund (GMLVX) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that GMWEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMWEXGMLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

8.13%

-3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.61%

16.27%

-4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

18.74%

-4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.67%

16.55%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

17.63%

-1.40%

GMWEX vs. GMLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMWEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GMLVX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMWEX vs. GMLVX - Dividend Comparison

GMWEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.75%, more than GMLVX's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMLVX
GuideMark Emerging Markets Fund
1.15%1.50%3.01%3.46%17.44%9.65%0.19%1.76%15.38%0.71%0.35%1.34%
GMWEX
GuideMark World ex-US Fund
13.75%14.64%2.94%3.43%3.11%1.08%2.01%1.66%1.61%1.43%1.86%2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMWEX and GMLVX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMLVX has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to GMWEX (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMWEX dropped -70.00% vs GMLVX's -70.50%.

GMLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMWEX and GMLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer