PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMWEX vs. GMLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMWEX vs. GMLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX) and GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMWEX achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than GMLGX's 6.35% return. Over the past 10 years, GMWEX has underperformed GMLGX with an annualized return of 9.50%, while GMLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.89% annualized return.


GMWEX

1D
0.31%
1M
1.94%
YTD
8.33%
6M
7.45%
1Y
22.97%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
9.50%

GMLGX

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.09%
YTD
6.35%
6M
5.05%
1Y
20.78%
3Y*
18.76%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
13.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMWEX vs. GMLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMWEX
GuideMark World ex-US Fund
8.33%33.60%5.36%15.97%-16.19%11.70%8.58%20.02%-14.12%25.97%
GMLGX
GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund
6.35%14.26%22.35%25.27%-19.10%26.33%22.21%28.12%-5.53%20.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GMWEX and GMLGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2002

0.77

The correlation between GMWEX and GMLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMWEX vs. GMLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMWEX
GMWEX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GMWEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMWEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMWEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GMWEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMWEX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GMLGX
GMLGX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GMLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GMLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMWEX vs. GMLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX) and GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMWEXGMLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

2.28

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.69

9.67

-0.98

GMWEX vs. GMLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMWEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the GMLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMWEX and GMLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMWEX vs. GMLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMWEX drawdown since its inception was -70.00%, which is greater than GMLGX's maximum drawdown of -56.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMWEX and GMLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMWEXGMLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.00%

-56.56%

-13.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-9.59%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.52%

-20.36%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.28%

-25.54%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

-35.15%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-1.29%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-9.43%

-21.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.26%

+0.47%

Volatility

GMWEX vs. GMLGX - Volatility Comparison

GuideMark World ex-US Fund (GMWEX) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) at 3.82%. This indicates that GMWEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMWEXGMLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

3.82%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.16%

9.49%

+2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.68%

12.47%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.74%

17.68%

-1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

18.69%

-2.48%

GMWEX vs. GMLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMWEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GMLGX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMWEX vs. GMLGX - Dividend Comparison

GMWEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%, less than GMLGX's 17.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMLGX
GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund
17.38%18.49%4.20%0.75%10.27%3.03%0.38%1.01%2.22%4.25%2.99%3.08%
GMWEX
GuideMark World ex-US Fund
13.52%14.64%2.94%3.43%3.11%1.08%2.01%1.66%1.61%1.43%1.86%2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMWEX and GMLGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMWEX has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to GMLGX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMWEX dropped -70.00% vs GMLGX's -56.56%.

GMLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMWEX and GMLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer