GMOM vs. SYLD
GMOM (Cambria Global Momentum ETF) and SYLD (Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Cambria, while SYLD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, GMOM returned 7.69%/yr vs 12.98%/yr for SYLD. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMOM charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SYLD.
Performance
GMOM vs. SYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMOM achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than SYLD's 13.63% return. Over the past 10 years, GMOM has underperformed SYLD with an annualized return of 7.69%, while SYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.98% annualized return.
GMOM
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 29.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
SYLD
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 25.51%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.98%
GMOM vs. SYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 11.55% | 20.63% | 6.75% | 0.65% | -2.82% | 19.13% | 2.42% | 8.24% | -9.61% | 20.67% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 13.63% | 3.94% | 3.37% | 16.46% | -6.14% | 48.59% | 13.61% | 26.98% | -13.51% | 20.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOM and SYLD is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2014 | 0.55 |
The correlation between GMOM and SYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GMOM vs. SYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GMOM
SYLD
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Energy
GMOM
SYLD
Industrials
GMOM
SYLD
Basic Materials
GMOM
SYLD
Financial Services
GMOM
SYLD
Utilities
GMOM
SYLD
-
Technology
GMOM
SYLD
Consumer Cyclical
GMOM
SYLD
Communication Services
GMOM
SYLD
Consumer Defensive
GMOM
SYLD
Real Estate
GMOM
SYLD
-
Healthcare
GMOM
SYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMOM vs. SYLD — Risk / Return Rank
GMOM
SYLD
GMOM vs. SYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMOM | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.29 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 3.70 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.03 | 10.02 | +2.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMOM | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 1.65 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.28 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.57 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.57 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
GMOM vs. SYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOM drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, smaller than the maximum SYLD drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOM and SYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOM | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -45.36% | +20.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -6.93% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.73% | -26.62% | +12.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.16% | -26.62% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.03% | -45.36% | +20.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -1.31% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.81% | -5.66% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.55% | -0.11% |
Volatility
GMOM vs. SYLD - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) at 3.13%. This indicates that GMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMOM | SYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 3.13% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.18% | 9.94% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.61% | 15.55% | -1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 20.62% | -6.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 22.96% | -10.14% |
GMOM vs. SYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than SYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMOM vs. SYLD - Dividend Comparison
GMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than SYLD's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 3.01% | 2.16% | 3.63% | 2.52% | 3.42% | 1.24% | 2.60% | 1.90% | 2.05% | 1.77% | 1.88% |
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.86% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 1.92% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.52% | 1.57% | 1.92% | 6.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMOM and SYLD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMOM has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to SYLD (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMOM dropped -25.03% vs SYLD's -45.36%.
On 10-year performance, SYLD leads with 12.98% vs 7.69% for GMOM. On fees, SYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GMOM.
SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.58% for GMOM.
GMOM is categorized as Momentum, while SYLD is Mid Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for GMOM and 0.59% for SYLD.
GMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMOM and SYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer