GMOM vs. QTR
Compare and contrast key facts about Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR).
GMOM and QTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GMOM is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Nov 4, 2014. QTR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021.
Performance
GMOM vs. QTR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMOM vs. QTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 8.03% | 20.63% | 6.75% | 0.65% | -2.82% | 4.11% |
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | -6.22% | 14.52% | 21.46% | 45.53% | -29.94% | 4.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMOM achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly higher than QTR's -6.22% return.
GMOM
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- 8.03%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 28.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
QTR
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- -6.22%
- 6M
- -5.45%
- 1Y
- 17.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMOM vs. QTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than QTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMOM vs. QTR — Risk / Return Rank
GMOM
QTR
GMOM vs. QTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMOM | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 1.06 | +0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 1.59 | +0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.21 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 1.49 | +1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.60 | 5.22 | +6.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMOM | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 1.06 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.41 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOM and QTR is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GMOM vs. QTR - Dividend Comparison
GMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than QTR's 20.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 1.63% | 3.01% | 2.16% | 3.63% | 2.52% | 3.42% | 1.24% | 2.60% | 1.90% | 2.05% | 1.77% | 1.88% |
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 20.02% | 18.77% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GMOM vs. QTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOM drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, smaller than the maximum QTR drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOM and QTR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOM | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -31.72% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.54% | -12.29% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.18% | -9.70% | +4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -9.10% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 3.50% | -1.01% |
Volatility
GMOM vs. QTR - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) at 5.04%. This indicates that GMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMOM | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 5.04% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.87% | 10.86% | +1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.80% | 16.47% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 18.16% | -3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 18.16% | -5.40% |