GMOD vs. XXX
GMOD (GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF) and XXX (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. GMOD is actively managed, while XXX is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMOD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for XXX.
Performance
GMOD vs. XXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GMOD
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XXX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOD vs. XXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 3.65% |
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF | -4.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOD and XXX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMOD vs. XXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMOD vs. XXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOD drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, smaller than the maximum XXX drawdown of -13.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOD and XXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOD | XXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -13.06% | +6.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -6.79% | +6.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -5.80% | +4.71% |
Volatility
GMOD vs. XXX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMOD | XXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.83% | 23.30% | -14.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.83% | 23.30% | -14.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.83% | 23.30% | -14.47% |
GMOD vs. XXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than XXX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMOD vs. XXX - Dividend Comparison
GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than XXX's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 1.37% | 0.93% |
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF | 0.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMOD and XXX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GMOD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GMOD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XXX.
GMOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.09% for XXX.
They also come from different issuers: GMO and Cyber Hornet. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GMOD and 0.95% for XXX.
Find the right allocation for GMOD and XXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer