PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMOD vs. WIMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMOD vs. WIMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GMOD

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
6.85%
6M
6.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WIMA

1D
0.78%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOD vs. WIMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GMOD and WIMA is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMOD vs. WIMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GMOD vs. WIMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMOD vs. WIMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOD drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, which is greater than WIMA's maximum drawdown of -4.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOD and WIMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMODWIMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-4.81%

-1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-1.34%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.13%

-1.32%

+0.19%

Volatility

GMOD vs. WIMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMODWIMADifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.02%

20.49%

-11.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.02%

20.49%

-11.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.02%

20.49%

-11.47%

GMOD vs. WIMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WIMA's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMOD vs. WIMA - Dividend Comparison

GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than WIMA's 1.01% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, GMOD and WIMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GMOD.

WIMA has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.87% for GMOD.

They also come from different issuers: GMO and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GMOD and 0.42% for WIMA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMOD and WIMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer