GMOD vs. PRTO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GMOD (GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF) and PRTO (RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GMOD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for PRTO.

Performance

GMOD vs. PRTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF (PRTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GMOD

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.29%
• 6M: 5.04%
• YTD: 7.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRTO

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -2.35%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOD vs. PRTO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF	6.85%
PRTO RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF	7.15%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOD and PRTO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2026	0.85

Return for Risk

GMOD vs. PRTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF (PRTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

GMOD vs. PRTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOD drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, which is greater than PRTO's maximum drawdown of -4.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOD and PRTO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMOD	PRTO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.50%	-4.46%	-2.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-3.11%	+2.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.09%	-1.09%	0.00%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GMOD	PRTO	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.83%	15.46%	-6.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.83%	15.46%	-6.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.83%	15.46%	-6.63%

GMOD vs. PRTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PRTO's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMOD vs. PRTO - Dividend Comparison

GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while PRTO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF	1.37%	0.93%
PRTO RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMOD and PRTO in my portfolio?

GMOD and PRTO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GMOD or PRTO?

On fees, GMOD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMOD or PRTO?

GMOD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for PRTO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMOD or PRTO?

GMOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for PRTO.

What is the main difference between GMOD and PRTO?

They also come from different issuers: GMO and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GMOD and 0.82% for PRTO.