PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMOC vs. GMOD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMOC vs. GMOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF (GMOC) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOC achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than GMOD's 5.74% return.


GMOC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.00%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GMOD

1D
-1.79%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
5.74%
6M
6.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOC vs. GMOD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GMOC
GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.65%0.76%
GMOD
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF
5.74%1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOC and GMOD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMOC vs. GMOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF (GMOC) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GMOC vs. GMOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMOCGMODDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

8.33

1.77

+6.56

Drawdowns

GMOC vs. GMOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOC drawdown since its inception was -0.13%, smaller than the maximum GMOD drawdown of -6.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOC and GMOD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMOCGMODDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.13%

-6.50%

+6.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.83%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-1.16%

+1.15%

Volatility

GMOC vs. GMOD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMOCGMODDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49%

8.95%

-8.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.49%

8.95%

-8.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.49%

8.95%

-8.46%

GMOC vs. GMOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMOC vs. GMOD - Dividend Comparison

GMOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than GMOD's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GMOC
GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF
2.33%0.84%
GMOD
GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF
0.88%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMOC and GMOD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GMOC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GMOC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GMOD.

GMOC has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.88% for GMOD.

GMOC is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while GMOD is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GMOC and 0.50% for GMOD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMOC and GMOD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer