GMEY vs. AMDW
GMEY (YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
GMEY vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMEY achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 176.52% return.
GMEY
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- -5.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 176.52%
- 6M
- 174.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMEY vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GMEY YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF | 0.95% | -15.02% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 176.52% | 46.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMEY and AMDW is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMEY vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF (GMEY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMEY vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMEY drawdown since its inception was -25.67%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMEY and AMDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMEY | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.67% | -34.64% | +8.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.82% | -7.03% | -16.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -14.15% | -2.76% |
Volatility
GMEY vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMEY | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.31% | 83.01% | -54.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.31% | 83.01% | -54.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.31% | 83.01% | -54.70% |
GMEY vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GMEY and AMDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
GMEY vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison
GMEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.84%, more than AMDW's 37.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 37.07% | 34.78% |
GMEY YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF | 56.84% | 21.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMEY and AMDW have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GMEY and AMDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
GMEY has the higher dividend yield at 56.84%, compared with 37.07% for AMDW.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.
Find the right allocation for GMEY and AMDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer