GMEY vs. CONY
GMEY (YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
GMEY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMEY achieves a -8.59% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -28.89% return.
GMEY
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -13.24%
- 6M
- -19.18%
- YTD
- -8.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CONY
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- 6M
- -6.04%
- YTD
- -28.89%
- 1Y
- -44.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.79M | $6.36M | $9.84M | |
| $32.88K | $35.63K | $44.01K |
GMEY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GMEY YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.59% | -15.02% |
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -28.89% | -25.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMEY and CONY is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMEY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank
GMEY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CONY
GMEY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF (GMEY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMEY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.88 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMEY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMEY drawdown since its inception was -31.17%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMEY and CONY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMEY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.17% | -63.57% | +32.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -59.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.02% | -59.72% | +28.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.65% | -24.27% | +6.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 39.17% | — |
Volatility
GMEY vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMEY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.60% | 57.39% | -27.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.60% | 59.81% | -30.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.60% | 59.81% | -30.21% |
GMEY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GMEY and CONY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
GMEY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison
GMEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.28%, less than CONY's 165.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 165.10% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
GMEY YieldMax GME Option Income Strategy ETF | 70.28% | 21.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMEY and CONY have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GMEY and CONY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
CONY has the higher dividend yield at 165.10%, compared with 70.28% for GMEY.
Find the right allocation for GMEY and CONY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer