GMAY vs. QFLR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GMAY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GMAY returned 12.68% vs 26.58% for QFLR. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GMAY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.

Performance

GMAY vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMAY achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly lower than QFLR's 6.83% return.

GMAY

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 1.48%
• YTD: 4.67%
• 6M: 5.36%
• 1Y: 12.68%
• 3Y*: 12.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 6.83%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 26.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMAY vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May	4.67%	11.94%	10.78%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	6.83%	17.27%	16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GMAY and QFLR is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024	0.76

The correlation between GMAY and QFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

GMAY vs. QFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GMAY	QFLR
Technology	36.2%	50.8%
Financial Services	11.9%	0.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	18.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	12.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	3.2%
Industrials	8.1%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	9.2%
Energy	3.5%	1.1%
Utilities	2.3%	1.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	0.0%

Return for Risk

GMAY vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMAY

GMAY Risk / Return Rank: 87
GMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 90
GMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
GMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 93

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 74
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMAY vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMAY	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	2.37	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.03	3.22	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.44	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.10	3.51	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.02	14.97	+9.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GMAY vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMAY and QFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMAY	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	2.37	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.60	1.39	+0.21

Drawdowns

GMAY vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMAY drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAY and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMAY	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.75%	-13.97%	+2.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.11%	-7.61%	+4.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-0.54%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.72%	-2.49%	+1.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.53%	1.78%	-1.25%

Volatility

GMAY vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) is 1.22%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a volatility of 2.50%. This indicates that GMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMAY	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.22%	2.50%	-1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.71%	8.04%	-4.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.76%	11.27%	-6.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.84%	12.61%	-4.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.84%	12.61%	-4.77%

GMAY vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMAY vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither GMAY nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMAY and QFLR in my portfolio?

GMAY and QFLR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMAY or QFLR?

QFLR has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to GMAY (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMAY dropped -11.75% vs QFLR's -13.97%.

Which ETF is better, GMAY or QFLR?

On 1-year performance, QFLR leads with 26.58% vs 12.68% for GMAY. On fees, GMAY is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, GMAY has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GMAY or QFLR?

Over the 1-year period, QFLR has performed better with a 26.58% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMAY or QFLR?

GMAY is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMAY or QFLR?

GMAY and QFLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GMAY and QFLR?

GMAY is categorized as Options Trading, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GMAY and 0.89% for QFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.