GMAB vs. GIC
GMAB (Genmab A/S) and GIC (Global Industrial Company) are both stocks. GMAB operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while GIC operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, GMAB returned 4.28%/yr vs 21.48%/yr for GIC. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GMAB vs. GIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMAB achieves a -18.57% return, which is significantly lower than GIC's 11.00% return. Over the past 10 years, GMAB has underperformed GIC with an annualized return of 4.28%, while GIC has yielded a comparatively higher 21.48% annualized return.
GMAB
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- -18.57%
- 6M
- -19.90%
- 1Y
- 9.90%
- 3Y*
- -13.28%
- 5Y*
- -10.53%
- 10Y*
- 4.28%
GIC
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 21.48%
GMAB vs. GIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMAB Genmab A/S | -18.57% | 47.58% | -34.45% | -24.87% | 7.13% | -2.71% | 82.09% | 35.54% | -0.61% | -0.04% |
GIC Global Industrial Company | 11.00% | 22.45% | -34.29% | 69.66% | -41.04% | 18.77% | 62.74% | 7.69% | -1.33% | 286.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMAB and GIC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2009 | 0.13 |
The correlation between GMAB and GIC shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GMAB:
$16.01B
GIC:
$1.22B
GMAB:
$4.10
GIC:
$1.96
GMAB:
6.12
GIC:
16.28
GMAB:
0.41
GIC:
15.54
GMAB:
1.81
GIC:
0.87
GMAB:
2.82
GIC:
2.10
GMAB:
$8.84B
GIC:
$1.41B
GMAB:
$8.27B
GIC:
$500.00M
GMAB:
$3.81B
GIC:
$106.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMAB vs. GIC — Risk / Return Rank
GMAB
GIC
GMAB vs. GIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genmab A/S (GMAB) and Global Industrial Company (GIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMAB | GIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.19 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 0.76 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 1.42 | -0.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMAB vs. GIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMAB drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, smaller than the maximum GIC drawdown of -98.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAB and GIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMAB | GIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.20% | -98.09% | +13.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.51% | -30.04% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.44% | -53.19% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.10% | -53.19% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.10% | -55.74% | -7.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.52% | -25.96% | -22.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.09% | -58.91% | +27.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.86% | 16.02% | -1.16% |
Volatility
GMAB vs. GIC - Volatility Comparison
Genmab A/S (GMAB) has a higher volatility of 12.15% compared to Global Industrial Company (GIC) at 4.33%. This indicates that GMAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMAB | GIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.15% | 4.33% | +7.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.57% | 20.62% | +4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.45% | 41.31% | -6.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.47% | 39.21% | -5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.19% | 46.36% | -11.17% |
Dividends
GMAB vs. GIC - Dividend Comparison
GMAB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIC Global Industrial Company | 3.39% | 3.56% | 4.03% | 2.06% | 3.06% | 4.01% | 9.92% | 1.91% | 39.51% | 1.05% | 1.14% |
GMAB Genmab A/S | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GMAB vs. GIC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Genmab A/S and Global Industrial Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GMAB vs. GIC - Profitability Comparison
GMAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported a gross profit of 834.08M and revenue of 899.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.8%.
GIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported a gross profit of 121.90M and revenue of 350.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
GMAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported an operating income of 225.83M and revenue of 899.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.
GIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported an operating income of 20.60M and revenue of 350.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
GMAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported a net income of 53.20M and revenue of 899.32M, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
GIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported a net income of 16.60M and revenue of 350.40M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GMAB and GIC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMAB has higher volatility (12.15%) compared to GIC (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMAB dropped -84.20% vs GIC's -98.09%.
GIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMAB and GIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer