GLXY vs. SCHG
GLXY (Galaxy Digital Inc.) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past year, GLXY returned -21.84% vs 16.16% for SCHG. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GLXY vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLXY achieves a -6.04% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 4.99% return.
GLXY
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -14.56%
- 6M
- -25.65%
- YTD
- -6.04%
- 1Y
- -21.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -8.86%
SCHG
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- YTD
- 4.99%
- 1Y
- 16.16%
- 3Y*
- 21.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 18.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $133.62M | $141.92M | $181.78M | |
| $247.66M | $249.87M | $339.91M |
GLXY vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLXY Galaxy Digital Inc. | -6.04% | -4.85% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 4.99% | 18.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLXY and SCHG is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2025 | 0.49 |
The correlation between GLXY and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLXY vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
GLXY
SCHG
GLXY vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galaxy Digital Inc. (GLXY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLXY | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.15 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 0.83 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 2.62 | -3.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLXY vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLXY drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLXY and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLXY | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.71% | -34.59% | -26.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.71% | -16.41% | -44.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.98% | -3.10% | -47.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.18% | -5.19% | -23.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.74% | 5.19% | +30.55% |
Volatility
GLXY vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Galaxy Digital Inc. (GLXY) has a higher volatility of 30.77% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.32%. This indicates that GLXY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLXY | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.77% | 4.32% | +26.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.62% | 12.90% | +57.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.24% | 16.67% | +74.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.32% | 22.42% | +67.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.32% | 21.59% | +68.73% |
Dividends
GLXY vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
GLXY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLXY Galaxy Digital Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLXY and SCHG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLXY has higher volatility (30.77%) compared to SCHG (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLXY dropped -60.71% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLXY and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer